Open Banking
Open BankingOpen banking
Providers using this tag (267)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 104 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 76 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 29 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (140)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 40 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Open Banking” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 264 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Open Banking, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 38.9 | 19.8 | +19.1 | 264 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.3 | 23.4 | +16.9 | 264 |
| Discoverability | 70.9 | 61.2 | +9.7 | 264 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.7 | 14 | +4.7 | 264 |
| Contract Governance | 10.8 | 6.4 | +4.4 | 264 |
| Access Clarity | 30.1 | 26.5 | +3.6 | 264 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 10% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 44% | 11% | +33 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Klarna 76.3
- 2 MX Technologies 75.6
- 3 Qonto 71.7
- 4 Plaid 71.6
- 5 Citizens Financial Group 67.1
- 6 Memo Bank 66.4
- 7 iDenfy 66.2
- 8 Method Financial 65.9
- 9 Tink 65.2
- 10 Citi 62.2
- 1 iBanFirst 55.1
- 2 Lean Technologies 53.2
- 3 Chariot 53.2
- 4 Dwolla 52.9
- 5 Allica Bank 50.2
- 6 Citi 49.8
- 7 Modulr 49.7
- 8 Revolut 49.2
- 9 Up 48.4
- 10 Memo Bank 47.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.