Australia AFS, Credit and ADI Registers (ASIC + APRA licensing)

Where this market publishes its structure

• ASIC AFS licensees (data.gov.au CKAN asic-afs-licensee, afs_lic_202610.csv) machine-readable, 6539 licensees, names + ABN, no domains; 41 linked
• ASIC credit licensees (data.gov.au CKAN asic-credit-licensee, credit_lic_202610.csv) machine-readable, 4307 licensees (APPR + 7 SUSP), names only; 26 linked
• APRA register of authorised deposit-taking institutions (apra.gov.au) machine-readable, 126 ADIs in 4 sections; 50 foreign bank branches held; 25 linked
• APRA registered general insurers (apra.gov.au/registers/list-registered-general-insurers) machine-readable, 206 insurers; the task URL /register-of-general-insurers answers 404; 1 linked, 5 held
• ASIC Connect professional registers search (asic.gov.au) not machine-readable: per-name portal; the bulk data.gov.au extracts read instead

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 125 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it

builds-on 4 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

covered 3 · reached mainly through aggregators

regulated 60 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

core 2 · builds the connectors its customers need

list 6 · a long list on its own page, mostly unevidenced

long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges

distribution 5 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 42 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 1; bridges: 0.