Product Reference Data
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Australia Consumer Data Right register (accredited data recipients; banking, energy, non-bank lending) | 66% |
| Australia AFS, Credit and ADI Registers (ASIC + APRA licensing) | 34% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Product Reference Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46.3 | 18.2 | +28.1 | 46 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.8 | 22.1 | +22.7 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 24.2 | 9.4 | +14.8 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 71.5 | 57.9 | +13.6 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.9 | 12.4 | +9.5 | 46 |
| Access Clarity | 27.2 | 25 | +2.2 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 2% | 16% | -14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 14% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 83% | 13% | +70 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 13% | 2% | +11 |
| Governance rules | 96% | 35% | +61 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Up 61.5
- 2 Westpac 59.6
- 3 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank 56.4
- 4 Red Energy 55
- 5 St.George Bank 52.5
- 6 AMP Bank 51.5
- 7 Macquarie Bank 50.2
- 8 Bank of Queensland 46.9
- 9 BankVic 46
- 10 National Australia Bank 45
- 1 National Australia Bank 55.5
- 2 Up 49.5
- 3 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank 49.5
- 4 IMB Bank 40.7
- 5 Suncorp Bank 37.9
- 6 HSBC Bank Australia 37.9
- 7 Alex Bank 37.9
- 8 Great Southern Bank 36.1
- 9 Gateway Bank 33.6
- 10 ING Australia 32.9
Coverage caveat. 37 of 46 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.