CDR
Providers using this tag (62)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 31 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “CDR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 62 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged CDR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 45.3 | 20.4 | +24.9 | 62 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.6 | 23.8 | +18.8 | 62 |
| Discoverability | 73.9 | 61.5 | +12.4 | 62 |
| Contract Governance | 10 | 6.6 | +3.4 | 62 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.7 | 14.4 | +3.3 | 62 |
| Access Clarity | 23.3 | 27.2 | -3.9 | 62 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 11% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 76% | 12% | +64 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 AEMO 58.1
- 2 St.George Bank 55.1
- 3 Red Energy 55
- 4 Up 54.9
- 5 Westpac Banking Corporation 49.7
- 6 Simply Energy 48.5
- 7 Bank First 46.5
- 8 BankSA 46.1
- 9 Alinta Energy 45.3
- 10 BankVic 44.8
- 1 Up 48.4
- 2 Isometric 45.3
- 3 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank 44.1
- 4 AEMO 40.8
- 5 IMB Bank 39.4
- 6 Suncorp Bank 36.5
- 7 HSBC Bank Australia 36.5
- 8 Alex Bank 36.5
- 9 Wazo 35
- 10 Newcastle Permanent Building Society 34.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.