France Authorised Financial Firms (ACPR REGAFI + AMF white list)

Where this market publishes its structure

• REGAFI (regafi.fr Opendatasoft Explore API v2.1 exports: prd-banque-entites, prd-banque-autorisations, prd-banque-passeports-entrants) machine-readable, 25,705 entities; 728 French-authorised + 29 third-country branches + 1,254 EEA banks / investment firms passported in kept; names + LEI (2,530 LEIs; 325 rows resolved via Wikidata P1278); 17 providers linked
• REGAFI category listing (regafi.fr/spip.php?page=results&type=simple&id=2) not machine-readable: 404: the old SPIP search was retired when REGAFI moved to the Opendatasoft portal; the portal's own API replaces it
• AMF white list (amf-france.org listes-blanches, CSV export /fr/export/liste-blanche/73748/csv) machine-readable, 960 rows, 284 PSCA (MiCA CASP) and PSFP (crowdfunding) firms with websites; 2 linked (estateguru PSFP, n26 PSCA); 37 PSCA firms reused from crypto's ESMA edges
• AMF professionals page (amf-france.org/en/professionals) not machine-readable: 404 (2026-10-22); the white list above is the register
• ORIAS intermediary register (orias.fr) not machine-readable: search is behind a CAPTCHA (2026-10-22); not bypassed
• EBA Payment Institutions Register machine-readable, read by eu-psd2-payment-institutions; not re-read, edges reused
• ESMA interim MiCA CASP register machine-readable, read by crypto; not re-read, edges reused

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 70 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 3 · other companies invest to build on it

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators

regulated 42 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

standard 2 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

mixed 5 · no single mode dominates

list 3 · a long list on its own page, mostly unevidenced

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 12 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 26; bridges: 0.