France
Providers using this tag (160)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 64 Early or largely undocumented
SwanBitstackCasavoSequansSorbonne UniversityChronopostQuantiliaCoachClubEnedisDoctolibMONI (Ex-Monisnap)ShippingboOrusPlus SimpleLukoRevyzeKlarysLa Ruche qui dit Oui!École des Ponts ParisTechImplicityAccentaLa Fraise ProJoy (ex-Privateaser)KleioPoppinsSideCareÉcole Normale Supérieure de ParisYampaLassieÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonTrezyMeltyHabiteoAramisAutoheliosGraneetEvaneosMetrobloksPrettoLaliloVeesionDoorFeedHostnFlyAcheelFaksPrixtelTulypSumeriaWecasaPapernestMayAgrycoFleaseRegular FinanceSelencyDejbox (Refectory)DalmaEpsorHappypalMateraRockFiJokoDjustKartable
Minimal 59 Almost no public developer surface
AblacareKerysSilvrEduc-upTengoMontpellier Open DataENGIECorWaveManoManoINSEEOrnikar8secCheerzLa VieGourmeyKarnottVekiaWandercraftLa SoliveAbbelightDemander JusticeHappytalInmemori45-8 ENERGYAsap WorkShowroomprive.comGraceFinresJimmyAmbleaCartheraFlatlookerStem AIAlanBforbankLe CollectionistLydiaCredit AgricoleValueCoToastyAlassioGens de confianceStarOfServiceKiuteQapaBoursobankSplash 360Outil AchatsOutils De Gestion Des RisquesOutils De TarificationOutils De TransfertOutils De Travail DigitauxOutils DigitauxBoxy (ex-Storelift)Jam.ggQualteraSeizaUptimeYnsect
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Orange Business Operator Eligibility (France) APICheck broadband and fibre eligibility at a French address for operator partners — feeds B2B onboarding flows.Orange Business RIP Operator Eligibility (France) APIPublic-initiative network (RIP) fibre eligibility check for French regional fibre rollouts, used by alterna...
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Score breakdown
Frequency
60.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.8
spread across providers
Quality lift
20.9
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
4.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Europe 12 co-occurrences
Fintech Insurtech 5 co-occurrences
Ai Data 5 co-occurrences
Insurtech 10 co-occurrences
Climate Tech 6 co-occurrences
Marketplace 25 co-occurrences
Insurance 14 co-occurrences
Consumer 22 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag160
Api tag4
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| France AMF Asset-Management Register (GECO) | 100% |
| France Authorised Financial Firms (ACPR REGAFI + AMF white list) | 31% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 149 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged France, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
149
of 160 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
9.9
-2.1 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 149 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 9Developing 15Thin 11Emerging 56Minimal 57
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 27.5 | 23.9 | +3.6 | 149 |
| Contract Governance | 6.1 | 6.5 | -0.4 | 149 |
| Discoverability | 57.3 | 57.9 | -0.6 | 149 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.6 | 13 | -2.4 | 149 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.2 | 23.2 | -5 | 149 |
| Contract Quality | 11.7 | 17.2 | -5.5 | 149 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 16% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Memo Bank
- 2 JuriSign
- 3 Orange Business
- 4 HumanMirror
- 5 Groupe BPCE
- 6 Lengow
- 7 La Poste Groupe
- 8 Sirenic
- 9 Malt
- 10 Pennylane
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Sirenic {"score" => 71.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 Memo Bank {"score" => 62.3, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 3 ETSI {"score" => 45.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Orange Business {"score" => 43.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 Pennylane {"score" => 41.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 Lifen {"score" => 40.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 7 Riot {"score" => 40, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 8 Underdog {"score" => 39.9, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 Groupe BPCE {"score" => 39.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 HumanMirror {"score" => 38.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
All 160 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 149 carry a score (93%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 141 of 149 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 141 of 149 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.