Insurance
Providers using this tag (653)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 63 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 80 Limited public surface area
Emerging 244 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 248 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (143)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 56 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (29)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Insurance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
653 providers carry this tag directly, and 739 counting the 20 narrower tags below and the 1 beneath them — 86 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 632 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Insurance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 6.1 | 6.3 | -0.2 | 632 |
| Discoverability | 57.6 | 58.1 | -0.5 | 632 |
| Access Clarity | 25.4 | 26.5 | -1.1 | 632 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.6 | 23.2 | -4.6 | 632 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.2 | 13.7 | -5.5 | 632 |
| Contract Quality | 10.4 | 17.6 | -7.2 | 632 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Canopy Connect 67.5
- 2 Candid Health 65.8
- 3 Healthie 65.8
- 4 Guidewire 65.2
- 5 Kota 60.8
- 6 Affinda 60.4
- 7 Zocdoc 59.9
- 8 1Fort 58.2
- 9 Ribbon Health 58.1
- 10 Levitate 57.1
- 1 Clearspeed 58.1
- 2 Affinda 54.2
- 3 Socotra 52.3
- 4 Mireye 51.4
- 5 Zocdoc 49
- 6 HealthSherpa 46.8
- 7 Centene 46.6
- 8 Levitate 45.1
- 9 PlanSource 45.1
- 10 Ripe Insurance 43.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.