Insurtech
Providers using this tag (293)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
CodaficationCuvvaArchipelagoTurtlemintPie InsuranceSuper SegurosZegoCover GeniusGet CoveredAckoLEEO Insurance ServicesAgentsyncSteadilyLiberate InnovationsSantéVetAt-BayINSTANDACCC Intelligent SolutionsLiberateQuanTemplateCoalitionHawkSoftArtificial LabsJerryAccelerantCoverforceAgencyZoomNowCertsLadder
Emerging 130 Early or largely undocumented
CytoraBranchMyloAdaptive InsuranceBy MilesAmplifyMarshmallowHoney InsuranceTruflaLassieKalepaSideCareFinaeoStoikSend TechnologyAssured AlliesbolttechSprout.aiYourcounterpartYulifemuffintechAfficiencyclaimsforceLeaseLockhyperexponentialINZMOLemonaideDalmaSafelyAforiGetsafeAgenteroSafety WingGood DriverUrban JungleInsuretech ConnectConcirrusPitziWaffle LabsEmbrokerHokanJustosAzosCustodianDescartes UnderwritingCoterie InsuranceHeraldKi InsuranceTintComulateWeavDefinity FinancialSemseeiambuddy.comWynsureElpha SecureResilienceWaterlilyAlaffiaClaim GeniusManyPetsCertificialCoverdashCyberCubeEthosOpen GISecondSightSana BenefitsRisklyticsDigitalOwlHDVI (High Definition Vehicle Insurance)EIS GroupAngle HealthElevateSureBetterView MarketplaceCLARA AnalyticsAssuredShift TechnologyFederatoPasitoMaticNewfrontAcheelEbixSupercedeEZLynxNirvana TechRainwalk TechnologyLovysCorgiSofiaZensuranceSoftheonVouchKlaimeeLukoOpenlyCurativeJonesAdvise InsuranceDistrict CoverGoose InsuranceSimplyinsuredCovr Financial TechnologiesPlus SimpleNova BenefitsOnliaAllCareClearcoverCoverWalletHealthcare.comBrizaActurisSonnet InsuranceOttonovaWallet StudioPolicygeniusHippoClarkLedgebrookCoverfoxNovideaReliance HealthStride HealthSuperscriptaxiTrustCowbellNava BenefitsWithcoverage
Minimal 102 Almost no public developer surface
CrabiWellxaiZopperCyenceUnderstoryHedvigCartrawlerCoverHoundCorvus InsuranceBetterflyAnywhere 2 GoiglooGraceOpenEyes InsuranceAssurelyInRiskFlockSlice LabsPolicyPalBoost InsuranceMelon Digital InsuranceDesaisivgetdinghyHealfKoffie FinancialOtt RiskP2P, Inc.StableAgencyKPIHealth IQVesttooEarnixJettyPlayer's HealthApplied SystemsOmniusClaimSortedGydeHugoOrusRoostVivereLoop HealthOneShieldReservVertaforeMetromileSo SureAkur8SnapsheetDatalotLumityChestnutAnzenEnvelop RiskPolicybazaarSixfoldTrupanionHarperTurboRaterOpterrixeHealthGroundspeedBestowGangkharStereOne AssistPhotocertDayforwardBreathe LifeInsurdataKayumPantawefoxIndio TechnologiesEvolutionIQKinroCyberwritePorchBalance ReZhongAn InsuranceBringyShepherdEnsuranceComparaOnlineTractableJenesis SoftwareLeapStackMountOrnikarRoteYuanbao (元保)Renegade InsuranceAmodoDatainsuranceHuon HoldingsIDI InsurancePoppins HealthRaincoatTrue LinkHarperLeaky
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Frequency
62.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.8
spread across providers
Quality lift
17.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
41.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
293 providers carry this tag directly, and 295 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Insurance 279 co-occurrences
Underwriting 67 co-occurrences
Embedded Insurance 46 co-occurrences
Property and Casualty 46 co-occurrences
Claims 49 co-occurrences
Brokerage 40 co-occurrences
Commercial Insurance 25 co-occurrences
Health Insurance 31 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag293
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Insurance and Insurtech | 60% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 278 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Insurtech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
278
of 293 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
17.9
-6.2 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
6.3
-7.8 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
0–66.3
median 13.4 · σ 13.3
How the 278 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 5Developing 23Thin 29Emerging 130Minimal 91
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.4 | 30 | -0.6 | 278 |
| Discoverability | 57 | 59.1 | -2.1 | 278 |
| Contract Governance | 7.3 | 9.7 | -2.4 | 278 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.4 | 13.2 | -6.8 | 278 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.1 | 24.5 | -8.4 | 278 |
| Contract Quality | 8.3 | 18.6 | -10.3 | 278 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 18% | -13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 16% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 36% | -20 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 1Fort 66.3
- 2 Kota 65.3
- 3 Aclaimant 58.7
- 4 Cover Whale 57.6
- 5 APOLLO Insurance 56.7
- 6 Origami Risk 54.9
- 7 Nayya 53.9
- 8 Socotra 52.9
- 9 Ascend 51.5
- 10 Evari 51.4
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Socotra 53.2
- 2 180 Insurance 44.3
- 3 Kota 43.2
- 4 Ripe Insurance 42.4
- 5 Cover Whale 41.7
- 6 Open 38.3
- 7 Qoala 38
- 8 Zinnia 37.5
- 9 Ease 36.8
- 10 back9ins-com 35.1
All 293 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 278 carry a score (95%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 274 of 278 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 274 of 278 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.