Insurtech
Providers using this tag (288)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
LakaCachetQoalaCodaficationCuvvaArchipelagoTurtlemintSuper SegurosPie InsuranceZegoCover GeniusEaseRoot InsuranceAgentsyncWunderiteMajescoAckoFintarySteadilySantéVetLEEO Insurance ServicesAt-BayCoalitionLiberate InnovationsLiberateINSTANDACCC Intelligent SolutionsHawkSoftQuanTemplateArtificial LabsJerryCoverforceNowCerts
Emerging 112 Early or largely undocumented
CytoraGet CoveredBranchAmplifyAdaptive InsuranceHoney InsuranceLassieFinaeoSideCareMarshmallowTruflaSend TechnologyBy MilesKalepaAssured AlliesbolttechYourcounterpartStoikSprout.aiYulifemuffintechAforiAfficiencyclaimsforcehyperexponentialLemonaideInsuretech ConnectLeaseLockSafelyWaffle LabsConcirrusHokanSafety WingCyenceGood DriverAgenteroCrabiDalmaCoterie InsuranceWeavHeraldLadderAccelerantTintWaterlilySemseeManyPetsWynsureDefinity FinancialKi InsuranceCertificialComulateiambuddy.comRisklyticsOpen GIAlaffiaResilienceSureSecondSightDigitalOwlElpha SecureSupercedeElevateHDVI (High Definition Vehicle Insurance)CoverdashSana BenefitsCyberCubeEthosAngle HealthEIS GroupLovysCLARA AnalyticsAdvise InsuranceFederatoShift TechnologySoftheonEZLynxEbixOpenlyRainwalk TechnologyAssuredPasitoSofiaAcheelMaticBetterView MarketplaceCoverWalletZensuranceNewfrontCorgiHippoAllCareNirvana TechWallet StudioActurisLukoNova BenefitsOttonovaApplied SystemsSonnet InsuranceVouchGoose InsuranceOnliaCovr Financial TechnologiesCurativeBrizaJonesMetromileDistrict CoverOrusPlus SimpleSimplyinsured
Minimal 121 Almost no public developer surface
Descartes UnderwritingPitziGetsafeJustosZopperHedvigAzosCartrawlerCoverHoundCustodianWellxaiUrban JungleUnderstoryEmbrokerINZMOCorvus InsuranceBetterflyAnywhere 2 GoOpenEyes InsuranceAssurelyGraceInRiskSlice LabsFlockiglooMelon Digital InsurancePolicyPalDesaisivgetdinghyHealfStableKoffie FinancialOtt RiskP2P, Inc.AgencyKPIHealth IQVesttooClearcoverEarnixHealthcare.comVertaforeaxiTrustHippo InsuranceOneShieldClaim GeniusClarkLedgebrookPolicygeniusCoverfoxJettyNovideaPlayer's HealthReliance HealthRoostStride HealthSuperscriptAkur8CowbellDatalotGydeLumityOmniusWithcoverageNava BenefitsTrupanionChestnutClaimSortedHugoSo SureGroundspeedTurboRaterOpterrixLoop HealthVivereHarperAnzenReservEnvelop RiskSnapsheetStereSixfoldGangkharKlaimeeeHealthOne AssistDayforwardBreathe LifePhotocertInsurdataKayumPantaPolicybazaarIndio TechnologiesBestowEvolutionIQKinrowefoxBalance ReCyberwritePorchZhongAn InsuranceBringyEnsuranceShepherdComparaOnlineJenesis SoftwareLeapStackOrnikarTractableMountRoteYuanbao (元保)AmodoPoppins HealthRaincoatRenegade InsuranceTrue LinkDatainsuranceHuon HoldingsIDI InsuranceLeaky
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Frequency
66.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
6.5
spread across providers
Quality lift
17.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
43.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
288 providers carry this tag directly, and 289 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Insurance 275 co-occurrences
Underwriting 66 co-occurrences
Embedded Insurance 46 co-occurrences
Property and Casualty 46 co-occurrences
Claims 49 co-occurrences
Brokerage 40 co-occurrences
Commercial Insurance 25 co-occurrences
Health Insurance 31 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag289
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Insurance and Insurtech | 60% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 276 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Insurtech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
276
of 288 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
17
-5.2 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
6.3
-5.7 vs catalog 12
Spread
0–64.5
median 12.1 · σ 12.4
How the 276 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 17Thin 33Emerging 112Minimal 111
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 23.9 | 23.9 | 0 | 276 |
| Contract Governance | 5.5 | 6.5 | -1 | 276 |
| Discoverability | 56.8 | 57.9 | -1.1 | 276 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.2 | 13 | -6.8 | 276 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 15.4 | 23.2 | -7.8 | 276 |
| Contract Quality | 8.1 | 17.2 | -9.1 | 276 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 16% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 1Fort 64.5
- 2 Kota 61.4
- 3 Aclaimant 54.5
- 4 APOLLO Insurance 52.4
- 5 LeO 51.8
- 6 Nayya 51
- 7 Origami Risk 51
- 8 Socotra 50.9
- 9 Qover 49
- 10 TrustLayer 48.5
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Socotra 53.2
- 2 180 Insurance 44.3
- 3 Kota 43.2
- 4 Ripe Insurance 42.4
- 5 Open 38.3
- 6 Qoala 38
- 7 Zinnia 37.5
- 8 Ease 36.8
- 9 LeO 32.6
- 10 Ascend 32.4
All 288 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 276 carry a score (96%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 274 of 276 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 274 of 276 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.