Health Insurance
Providers using this tag (140)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 51 Early or largely undocumented
Angle HealthGrantedYulifeSofiaPrudentialOscarNova BenefitsOttonovaCurativeSimplyinsuredLegal & GeneralEmployee NavigatorClaim.MDAvivaMedibankBupa AustraliaArbital HealthCanada LifeHCFbswiftRightwayWynsureInsurfGravieVitalityCollective HealthFirefly HealthBlue Cross CanadaPrescienceSideCareAlaffiaLegacySana BenefitsHealthJoyFortuna HealthStack HealthAdvise InsuranceEquip HealthMachinifySoftheonTriple-S ManagementTomorrow HealthEbixReinsurance Group of AmericaAcheelAeon LifeSafety WingGoose InsuranceBabaCentivoRuma Care
Minimal 45 Almost no public developer surface
Healthcare.comMedeAnalytics (JLL Partners)Sidecar HealthAmeraGydeNava BenefitsGetInsuredeHealthKaiser PermanenteCNO Financial GroupAmerigroupAlanUniversal AmericanDesaisivHealfPoppins HealthMedical Mutual of OhioThe Cigna GroupCakeHealthHarbor HealthRovi HealthAmerican National InsuranceOoda HealthTalkspaceClinikkArctic HealthEasyhealthReliance HealthStride HealthHandl HealthChapterLoop HealthWeDoctorCVS HealthUPMCNeueHealthMedi AssistClaimglideBright HealthLeapStackyuanxinjituanBrighterHealth NetIndependence Health GroupPing An HealthKonnect
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Abi APIPartner REST API for managing user accounts, subscriptions, text consultations, form-based prescriptions, H...Bupa Australia APIs (Integration Fabric)The Bupa Australia API estate, published through an Azure API Management managed developer portal at portal...Portal de APIs Bupa (Bupa Chile)The Bupa Chile API portal at apidoc.bupa.cl — an Angular single-page application that ships Swagger UI and ...
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Aviva Private Medical Insurance Consumer Pricing APIListed in the Aviva API Developer Portal service catalogue as an API that calculates premiums for Aviva con...Aviva Private Medical Insurance Consumer Purchase APIListed in the Aviva API Developer Portal service catalogue as the purchase counterpart to the pricing API, ...Bupa Australia Developer Portal APIsBupa HI Pty Ltd's Azure API Management developer portal ("Discover Bupa APIs"). The portal lists no APIs or...Gravie Transparency in Coverage Machine-Readable FilesPublic machine-readable files Gravie posts on behalf of its plan sponsors under the CMS Transparency in Cov...Vitality Partner API GatewayVitality's production API gateway, running WSO2 API Manager at apis.vitality.co.uk (origin wso2-prd-apigw.t...
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
58.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
22.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
11.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Employee Benefits 36 co-occurrences
Provider Directory 16 co-occurrences
Patient Access 17 co-occurrences
Insurance 76 co-occurrences
Claims 28 co-occurrences
Medicare 16 co-occurrences
Life Insurance 18 co-occurrences
Eligibility 15 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag140
Api tag13
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Payer Interoperability (CAQH CORE, X12, Da Vinci, WEDI) | 39% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 136 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Health Insurance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
136
of 140 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
22
-0.2 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
10.6
-1.4 vs catalog 12
Spread
2.2–77.3
median 17.1 · σ 15.8
How the 136 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 4Developing 17Thin 20Emerging 51Minimal 42
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.8 | 23.9 | +4.9 | 136 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.5 | +2.2 | 136 |
| Discoverability | 59 | 57.9 | +1.1 | 136 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.7 | 23.2 | -3.5 | 136 |
| Contract Quality | 13.6 | 17.2 | -3.6 | 136 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.4 | 13 | -3.6 | 136 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 16% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Stedi 77.3
- 2 Flexpa 72.2
- 3 Availity 64.9
- 4 Kota 61.4
- 5 Optum 57
- 6 Turquoise Health 55
- 7 Independence Blue Cross 54
- 8 pVerify 51.2
- 9 Eligible 50.3
- 10 CMS — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 46.5
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Stedi 61.7
- 2 Turquoise Health 54.6
- 3 Flexpa 48.6
- 4 HealthSherpa 47.9
- 5 Centene 47.7
- 6 PlanSource 46.4
- 7 Kota 43.2
- 8 Justworks 41.7
- 9 Aetna 41.3
- 10 CMS — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 40.1
All 140 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 136 carry a score (97%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 126 of 136 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 126 of 136 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.