Healthcare
Providers using this tag (2228)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 15 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 39 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 119 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 125 Limited public surface area
Emerging 737 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1178 Almost no public developer surface
Showing the top 1,000 of 1,178 by rating. See them all →
APIs with this tag (173)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 52 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 20 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Healthcare” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
2228 providers carry this tag directly, and 2793 or more counting the 81 narrower tags below and the 18 beneath them — 743 more to reach. A count here is a floor: one of these tags holds more members than are listed.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 2004 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Healthcare, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5 | 6.5 | -1.5 | 2004 |
| Access Clarity | 21.7 | 23.9 | -2.2 | 2004 |
| Discoverability | 54.5 | 57.9 | -3.4 | 2004 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.2 | 13 | -6.8 | 2004 |
| Contract Quality | 6.9 | 17.2 | -10.3 | 2004 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.8 | 23.2 | -10.4 | 2004 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 16% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 79.4
- 2 Amigo 78.8
- 3 Stedi 77.3
- 4 drchrono 77
- 5 Paubox 77
- 6 Veeva 76.1
- 7 ZnanyLekarz 74.3
- 8 Hint Health 73.5
- 9 Flexpa 72.2
- 10 Medplum 71.7
- 1 Medblocks 66.3
- 2 Stedi 61.7
- 3 Paubox 60.9
- 4 xCures 59.5
- 5 b.well 58.6
- 6 Loa Healthcare Pricing API 58.3
- 7 Medplum 55.8
- 8 Turquoise Health 54.6
- 9 KarmaCheck 54.1
- 10 Kontakt.io 53.2
Coverage caveat. 1935 of 2004 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.