Healthcare
Health CareHealthcarehealthcare
Providers using this tag (2022)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 23 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 57 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 115 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 139 Limited public surface area
Emerging 645 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1021 Almost no public developer surface
Showing the top 1,000 of 1,021 by rating. See them all →
APIs with this tag (201)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 29 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 40 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 43 Limited public surface area
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Healthcare” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1833 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Healthcare, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5.2 | 6.4 | -1.2 | 1833 |
| Access Clarity | 23.1 | 26.5 | -3.4 | 1833 |
| Discoverability | 56.7 | 61.2 | -4.5 | 1833 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.5 | 14 | -7.5 | 1833 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.9 | 23.4 | -10.5 | 1833 |
| Contract Quality | 7.8 | 19.8 | -12 | 1833 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 10% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 14% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 87.4
- 2 Elation Health 83.7
- 3 Stedi 83.1
- 4 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 81.3
- 5 drchrono 80.9
- 6 athenahealth 76.7
- 7 1upHealth 75.7
- 8 Veeva 75.6
- 9 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 10 Vital 73.9
- 1 Medblocks 64.4
- 2 Paubox 61.5
- 3 xCures 59
- 4 Stedi 55.9
- 5 KarmaCheck 55.1
- 6 Turquoise Health 53.8
- 7 Photon 53.8
- 8 Medplum 52
- 9 Kontakt.io 51.8
- 10 Jane 50.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.