Healthcare
Providers using this tag (2088)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 15 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 48 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 112 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 124 Limited public surface area
Emerging 687 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1087 Almost no public developer surface
Showing the top 1,000 of 1,087 by rating. See them all →
APIs with this tag (177)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 35 Limited public surface area
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Healthcare” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
2088 providers carry this tag directly, and 2616 or more counting the 82 narrower tags below and the 19 beneath them — 615 more to reach. A count here is a floor: one of these tags holds more members than are listed.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1887 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Healthcare, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5.1 | 6.3 | -1.2 | 1887 |
| Discoverability | 54.6 | 58.1 | -3.5 | 1887 |
| Access Clarity | 22.8 | 26.5 | -3.7 | 1887 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.4 | 13.7 | -7.3 | 1887 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.9 | 23.2 | -10.3 | 1887 |
| Contract Quality | 7 | 17.6 | -10.6 | 1887 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 14% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 79.1
- 2 Stedi 78.8
- 3 Elation Health 77.5
- 4 drchrono 76.3
- 5 Veeva 72.8
- 6 1upHealth 71.7
- 7 Vital 70.2
- 8 eClinicalWorks 69.7
- 9 athenahealth 69.1
- 10 Hint Health 69
- 1 Medblocks 64.4
- 2 Paubox 61.5
- 3 Stedi 59.5
- 4 xCures 59
- 5 b.well 57.7
- 6 Loa Healthcare Pricing API 55.9
- 7 KarmaCheck 55.1
- 8 Affinda 54.2
- 9 Turquoise Health 53.8
- 10 Medplum 52
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.