Remote Patient Monitoring
Providers using this tag (71)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 65 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Remote Patient Monitoring, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.5 | 26.5 | +3 | 65 |
| Contract Governance | 6.8 | 6.5 | +0.3 | 65 |
| Discoverability | 57.9 | 61 | -3.1 | 65 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.4 | 14 | -5.6 | 65 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.5 | 23.4 | -8.9 | 65 |
| Contract Quality | 8 | 20.1 | -12.1 | 65 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 2 Validic 62.1
- 3 Athelas 53.6
- 4 Sonde Health 51.3
- 5 Huma 47.8
- 6 VivaLNK 42.2
- 7 Eko Health 41.7
- 8 Withings 40.7
- 9 Empatica 40
- 10 BodyTrace 36.7
- 1 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 2 Validic 33.1
- 3 Athelas 30.4
- 4 Sonde Health 26.8
- 5 Withings 26.6
- 6 Huma 25.6
- 7 Cardiosense 23
- 8 Manage BGL 21
- 9 VivaLNK 19.8
- 10 BodyTrace 19.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.