Remote Patient Monitoring
Providers using this tag (59)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 25 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 59 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Remote Patient Monitoring, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 26.5 | 22.3 | +4.2 | 59 |
| Contract Governance | 6.8 | 6.4 | +0.4 | 59 |
| Discoverability | 58.2 | 60.4 | -2.2 | 59 |
| Operational Transparency | 7.7 | 11.3 | -3.6 | 59 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 13.4 | 17.9 | -4.5 | 59 |
| Contract Quality | 7.4 | 17.5 | -10.1 | 59 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 16% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 9% | +1 |
| Security | 90% | 88% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 eClinicalWorks 74.9
- 2 Validic 64.2
- 3 Athelas 56.5
- 4 Huma 43.7
- 5 Eko Health 42.8
- 6 VivaLNK 40.5
- 7 Empatica 40
- 8 Withings 37.3
- 9 Manage BGL 35.8
- 10 BodyTrace 35
- 1 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 2 Validic 30.6
- 3 Athelas 30.4
- 4 Withings 26.6
- 5 Huma 25.6
- 6 Eko Health 24.8
- 7 Manage BGL 21
- 8 Alivecor 19.8
- 9 BodyTrace 19.8
- 10 VivaLNK 19.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.