Markets · bedrock market · provisional

GA4GH Genomics Standards (htsget, DRS, TES, WES, Beacon, Passports)

Register + standard market (ga4gh organisational membership, ga4gh implementations list). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

50providers measured

5 (10.0%)declare their own

32 (64.0%)covered by others only

3 (6.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)

10 (20.0%)undeclared

1declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)

0in-market workflows shown

Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

GA4GH organisational members (ga4gh.org/community/organizational-members/) machine-readable, 646 rows, 617 with a website; 28 in-market providers linked; 10 out-of-market; 248 held by member type / host
GA4GH implementations list (ga4gh.org/our-products/implementations/) machine-readable, 38 named implementations; 0 linked (public data commons / archives; github.com shared host)
GA4GH products page (ga4gh.org/our-products/) machine-readable, product list only (context: standards names); carries no organisations
github.com/ga4gh spec READMEs (task-execution-schemas, workflow-execution-service-schemas implementation lists) machine-readable, 50 rows, community-provided with an explicit no-compliance disclaimer: shape, report-only; 46 on shared hosts (github.com), 0 in-market links
GA4GH Service Registry (registry.ga4gh.org) machine-readable, read by life-sciences (sweep-life-sciences.py); not re-read, edges reused
GA4GH conformance / certification register not machine-readable: none published: GA4GH and its README lists disclaim compliance and endorsement (2026-10-22)
GA4GH driver projects (ga4gh.org/our-community/driver-projects/) not machine-readable: page renders no project list in the served HTML (no list items, no external links); not bypassed

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 50 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

Tags	Life Sciences 74%, Healthcare 56%, Bioinformatics 42%, Genomics 40%, Biotechnology 34%
Tag groups	Healthcare 98%
Industries	Biotechnology & Drug Discovery 80%, Life Sciences 74%, Healthcare 62%, Digital Health & Telehealth 30%, Pharmaceutical 22%
Areas	Machine Learning 12%

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Seqera Labs	34.9	4	0 / 4	0	1	1	ipaas-bridge 25%, builds-on-platform 50%, distribution 25%

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Epic Systems	54.7	19	0 / 19	0	0	0	contract 16%, standard 21%, coverage 63%

regulated 8 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	Mix
Foundation Medicine	59.7	3	0 / 3	0	contract 67%, standard 33%
Thermo Fisher Scientific	59.2	7	0 / 7	0	contract 71%, standard 29%
Eli Lilly	58.5	10	0 / 10	0	contract 50%, standard 50%
Flatiron Health	57.9	3	0 / 3	0	contract 67%, standard 33%
DNAnexus	46.9	7	0 / 7	3	contract 29%, standard 29%, distribution 43%
Seven Bridges	38.8 thin	2	0 / 2	0	contract 50%, standard 50%
IQVIA	38.6	6	0 / 6	4	contract 17%, standard 17%, distribution 67%
Metabolon	19.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	contract 100%

standard 26 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	Mix
Vertex Pharmaceuticals	63.3	7	0 / 7	0	contract 43%, standard 57%
Sanofi	59.7	5	0 / 5	0	contract 40%, standard 60%
Merck	57.8	6	0 / 6	0	contract 33%, standard 67%
Roche	56.4	7	0 / 7	0	contract 29%, standard 71%
Amgen	56.0	6	0 / 6	0	contract 33%, standard 67%
Biogen	56.0	6	0 / 6	0	contract 33%, standard 67%
GSK	55.0	5	0 / 5	0	contract 20%, standard 80%
Optum	53.0	12	0 / 12	3	contract 7%, standard 57%, builds-on-platform 14%, distribution 21%
Philips	51.4	10	0 / 10	1	standard 60%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 10%, atp-outside 10%
Clarivate	50.1	6	0 / 6	1	contract 17%, standard 50%, builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 17%
Invitae	48.5	4	0 / 4	1	contract 25%, standard 50%, distribution 25%
Dyno	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	0	standard 100%
Labcorp	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	0	standard 100%
Lifebit Biotech	34.5	4	0 / 4	3	standard 25%, distribution 75%
MyOme	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	0	standard 100%
ORCID	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	0	standard 100%
Apheris	26.8 thin	2	0 / 2	1	standard 50%, distribution 50%
Cdisc	26.8 thin	2	0 / 2	1	standard 50%, distribution 50%
Genialis	26.8 thin	2	0 / 2	1	standard 50%, distribution 50%
Admera Health	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%
Cancer.gov	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%
Color	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%
Inscripta	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%
Ixlayer	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%
Syapse	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	standard 100%

mixed 1 · no single mode dominates

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Verily Life Sciences	48.4	3	0 / 3	0	1	0	contract 33%, standard 33%, distribution 33%

distribution 3 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	Mix
TileDB	28.7	4	0 / 4	4	distribution 100%
Gencove	9.6 thin	1	0 / 1	2	distribution 100%
One Codex	9.6 thin	1	0 / 1	1	distribution 100%

undeclared 10 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge
A-Alpha Bio	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Amazon HealthOmics	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Element Biosciences	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
EvolutionaryScale	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
LinusBio	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
PubChem	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Strand AI	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Synthego	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Washington University in St. Louis	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Watchmaker Genomics	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-

Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.