Bioinformatics
Providers using this tag (74)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 28 Early or largely undocumented
AWAKENSLife SciencesUniProtChromaCodeChai DiscoveryReactomeMilaboratoriespiscesCSMVizgenEnsemblAdmera HealthGinkgo BioworksChampions OncologyBiomodalTwinStrand BiosciencesBostonGeneUltimagenomicsBiostate AIPillar Biosciences10x GenomicsParse BiosciencessophiageneticsSolveBioSvastiaArima GenomicsAsimovClear LabsProfluent
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
DNAnexus Platform APIThe DNAnexus Platform API is a JSON-over-HTTPS API of roughly 206 documented methods. Each method is invoke...Seven Bridges CAVATICA APICAVATICA is a pediatric-research data analysis platform Seven Bridges operates with the Children's Hospital...CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in CancerA free, open, community-curated knowledgebase of the clinical significance of variants in cancer, built and...
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
D3b Data Sharing PlatformsThe Center for Data Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b) at CHOP operates the open research data infrastru...NCBI BLAST URL APIAPI enabling developers to submit BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) sequence searches via HTTPS for...Lifebit CloudOS APIThe REST API behind the Lifebit Platform (CloudOS): manage workspace projects, job queues, workflows/pipeli...Terminus Protein Prediction APIA UNIGE-developed prediction service for protein N-terminal modifications (initial methionine cleavage and ...
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
DNAnexus Platform APIDNAnexus is a cloud bioinformatics platform used by pharma, biotech, and research institutions to run genom...Galaxy Project APIThe open-source Galaxy bioinformatics workbench exposes a REST API for managing histories, datasets, workfl...NCBI Entrez E-utilitiesThe set of nine programmatic interfaces (ESearch, EPost, ESummary, EFetch, ELink, EInfo, EGQuery, ESpell, E...Seven Bridges (Velsera) Platform APIA multi-cloud bioinformatics platform (now part of Velsera) offering hosted instances of the NCI Cancer Gen...EBI Proteins REST APIThe EMBL-EBI Proteins API provides integrated access to UniProt protein annotations alongside large-scale s...Natera Constellation Bioinformatics PlatformCloud-based platform giving partner laboratories programmatic access to Natera's cell-free DNA bioinformati...
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Bioinformatics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
53.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
28.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Genomics 52 co-occurrences
Sequencing 9 co-occurrences
Precision Medicine 16 co-occurrences
Multiomics 6 co-occurrences
Molecular Diagnostics 6 co-occurrences
DNA Sequencing 5 co-occurrences
Protein Design 5 co-occurrences
Life Sciences 56 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag74
Api tag13
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 69 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Bioinformatics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
69
of 74 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
24.4
+1.5 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
11.8
-0.1 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.5–57.7
median 22 · σ 14.8
How the 69 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 12Thin 13Emerging 28Minimal 13
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.1 | 23.2 | +3.9 | 69 |
| Contract Quality | 20.6 | 17.6 | +3 | 69 |
| Discoverability | 60.8 | 58.1 | +2.7 | 69 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.8 | 13.7 | +0.1 | 69 |
| Contract Governance | 5.5 | 6.3 | -0.8 | 69 |
| Access Clarity | 24.8 | 26.5 | -1.7 | 69 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 1% | 14% | -13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 1% | 12% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Amazon HealthOmics 57.7
- 2 Seqera Labs 57.3
- 3 One Codex 55.8
- 4 Gencove 53.7
- 5 DNAnexus 48.8
- 6 Element Biosciences 47.3
- 7 Seven Bridges 47
- 8 Dyno 45.7
- 9 Genialis 43
- 10 PubChem 41.9
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Metabolon 37.1
- 2 Genialis 34.4
- 3 Amazon HealthOmics 33.7
- 4 Galatea Bio 32.1
- 5 Strand AI 30.7
- 6 One Codex 29.6
- 7 STRING 29.1
- 8 Dyno 28.7
- 9 Element Biosciences 27.7
- 10 A-Alpha Bio 27.1
All 74 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 69 carry a score (93%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 58 of 69 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 58 of 69 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.