Genomics
Providers using this tag (163)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 76 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
163 providers carry this tag directly, and 164 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 143 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Genomics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 4.6 | 6.3 | -1.7 | 143 |
| Discoverability | 55.9 | 58.1 | -2.2 | 143 |
| Access Clarity | 22.1 | 26.5 | -4.4 | 143 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.9 | 23.2 | -6.3 | 143 |
| Operational Transparency | 7.1 | 13.7 | -6.6 | 143 |
| Contract Quality | 9.7 | 17.6 | -7.9 | 143 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 14% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 1% | 12% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon HealthOmics 57.7
- 2 One Codex 55.8
- 3 TileDB 55
- 4 Gencove 53.7
- 5 Cancer.gov 50
- 6 Color 49
- 7 DNAnexus 48.8
- 8 Element Biosciences 47.3
- 9 Seven Bridges 47
- 10 Genialis 43
- 1 Color 41.5
- 2 TileDB 36.5
- 3 Genialis 34.4
- 4 Amazon HealthOmics 33.7
- 5 Galatea Bio 32.1
- 6 National Institutes of Health (NIH) 30.6
- 7 One Codex 29.6
- 8 STRING 29.1
- 9 Cancer.gov 29
- 10 Element Biosciences 27.7
Coverage caveat. 131 of 143 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.