Biotechnology
BiotechBiotechnology
Providers using this tag (1136)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 159 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 930 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
1136 providers carry this tag directly, and 1065 counting the 15 narrower tags below — 17 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Chemistry and Materials (chemical data depositors, materials-data APIs) | 26% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 866 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Biotechnology, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 1.8 | 6.3 | -4.5 | 866 |
| Discoverability | 51.7 | 58.1 | -6.4 | 866 |
| Operational Transparency | 1.4 | 13.7 | -12.3 | 866 |
| Access Clarity | 11.6 | 26.5 | -14.9 | 866 |
| Contract Quality | 1.5 | 17.6 | -16.1 | 866 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 6.8 | 23.2 | -16.4 | 866 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 14% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 1% | 12% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 14% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Benchling 64.5
- 2 TetraScience 50.4
- 3 Aignostics 50
- 4 Biodock 47.7
- 5 Element Biosciences 47.3
- 6 Dyno 45.7
- 7 Cenevo 41.8
- 8 Roivant Sciences 41.8
- 9 Biogen 40.7
- 10 Metabolon 40.5
- 1 Aignostics 46
- 2 Benchling 41.3
- 3 A2 Biotherapeutics 38.3
- 4 Metabolon 37.1
- 5 Slingshot Biosciences 36.2
- 6 Aclid 35.1
- 7 Cenevo 32.5
- 8 Biogen 31.5
- 9 Labguru 29.8
- 10 PBS Biotech 29.7
Coverage caveat. 858 of 866 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.