Clinical Trials
Providers using this tag (303)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 79 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 177 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 5 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Clinical Trials” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 288 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Clinical Trials, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.7 | 6.5 | -2.8 | 288 |
| Discoverability | 58.1 | 61 | -2.9 | 288 |
| Access Clarity | 17.8 | 26.5 | -8.7 | 288 |
| Operational Transparency | 3 | 14 | -11 | 288 |
| Contract Quality | 7.9 | 20.1 | -12.2 | 288 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 9.2 | 23.4 | -14.2 | 288 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 10% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Veeva 75.6
- 2 Cancer.gov 53
- 3 Cdisc 52.9
- 4 Dimensions 51.3
- 5 Huma 47.8
- 6 Roivant Sciences 45.7
- 7 Medable 45.3
- 8 Meddra 43.6
- 9 VivaLNK 42.2
- 10 Castor 41.5
- 1 Endeavor BioMedicines 47.7
- 2 A2 Biotherapeutics 47.3
- 3 Engrail Therapeutics 46
- 4 Enveda 42.8
- 5 Leapcure 42.6
- 6 Scimar 42.3
- 7 Veeva 41.5
- 8 Dimensions 38.9
- 9 Pathalys Pharma 34.4
- 10 Impulse Dynamics 32.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.