Clinical Data
Providers using this tag (49)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Clinical Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 49 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Clinical Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 38.3 | 26.5 | +11.8 | 49 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.3 | 23.4 | +8.9 | 49 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.8 | 14 | +7.8 | 49 |
| Contract Quality | 26.8 | 19.8 | +7 | 49 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 6.4 | +5.5 | 49 |
| Discoverability | 64.3 | 61.2 | +3.1 | 49 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 83.7
- 2 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 3 Health Gorilla 68.2
- 4 xCures 64.2
- 5 Epic Systems 64.1
- 6 Ribbon Health 61.5
- 7 Practice Fusion 61.4
- 8 Particle Health 61.3
- 9 AWS HealthLake 59.4
- 10 Cadasto 59.4
- 1 xCures 59
- 2 EHRbase 50
- 3 Health Gorilla 43.7
- 4 Elation Health 42.3
- 5 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 6 Particle Health 39.2
- 7 Epic Systems 37.6
- 8 Practice Fusion 37.6
- 9 NHS Digital 32.3
- 10 EMIS Health 31.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.