Clinical Data
Clinical Dataclinical data
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (22)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Clinical Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.5 | 17.5 | +16 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 38.1 | 22.3 | +15.8 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.7 | 11.3 | +13.4 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.2 | 17.9 | +12.3 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 69.7 | 60.4 | +9.3 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 13.5 | 6.4 | +7.1 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 16% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 9% | +18 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 13% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 84.1
- 2 athenahealth 79.2
- 3 eClinicalWorks 74.9
- 4 Health Gorilla 72
- 5 Vim 68.2
- 6 Epic Systems 65.5
- 7 Particle Health 64.4
- 8 Ribbon Health 64.2
- 9 Practice Fusion 61.8
- 10 AWS HealthLake 61.3
- 1 Vim 48.4
- 2 Elation Health 48.1
- 3 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 4 Epic Systems 39.7
- 5 Health Gorilla 38.5
- 6 Practice Fusion 37.6
- 7 Particle Health 34
- 8 athenahealth 32.7
- 9 NHS Digital 32.3
- 10 Ribbon Health 31.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/clinical-data"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/clinical-data"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/clinical-data/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.