Clinical Data
Providers using this tag (49)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (16)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Clinical Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 49 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Clinical Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 38.6 | 26.5 | +12.1 | 49 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.5 | 23.2 | +9.3 | 49 |
| Contract Quality | 26.5 | 17.6 | +8.9 | 49 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.6 | 13.7 | +7.9 | 49 |
| Contract Governance | 11 | 6.3 | +4.7 | 49 |
| Discoverability | 62.7 | 58.1 | +4.6 | 49 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 14% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 12% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 77.5
- 2 eClinicalWorks 69.7
- 3 Health Gorilla 63.3
- 4 xCures 60.8
- 5 Epic Systems 59.9
- 6 Particle Health 59.5
- 7 Ribbon Health 58.1
- 8 Practice Fusion 57.4
- 9 Cadasto 55.5
- 10 AWS HealthLake 55.2
- 1 xCures 59
- 2 EHRbase 48.7
- 3 Health Gorilla 43.7
- 4 Elation Health 42.3
- 5 eClinicalWorks 40.1
- 6 Epic Systems 37.6
- 7 Practice Fusion 37.6
- 8 Particle Health 36.7
- 9 Oracle Health (Cerner) 33.5
- 10 NHS Digital 32.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.