Providers using this tag (69)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (30)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 69 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged HL7, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35 | 17.9 | +17.1 | 69 |
| Access Clarity | 35.3 | 22.3 | +13 | 69 |
| Discoverability | 71.2 | 60.4 | +10.8 | 69 |
| Contract Quality | 28 | 17.5 | +10.5 | 69 |
| Contract Governance | 16.8 | 6.4 | +10.4 | 69 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.2 | 11.3 | +8.9 | 69 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 16% | +20 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 33% | 9% | +24 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 13% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 84.1
- 2 athenahealth 79.2
- 3 1upHealth 76
- 4 NextGen Healthcare 75.7
- 5 Health Gorilla 72
- 6 Jefferson Health 71.1
- 7 Epic Systems 65.5
- 8 Particle Health 64.4
- 9 Aidbox 63.2
- 10 Redox 62.1
- 1 Elation Health 48.1
- 2 Aidbox 43.7
- 3 Epic Systems 39.7
- 4 NHS England 39.7
- 5 Devoted Health 39.5
- 6 Lifen 39.4
- 7 AdvancedMD 38.7
- 8 Fasten Health 38.5
- 9 Health Gorilla 38.5
- 10 Jefferson Health 36.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/hl7"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/hl7"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/hl7/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.