Electronic Health Records
Electronic Health Recordselectronic-health-records
Providers using this tag (59)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 59 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Electronic Health Records, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.1 | 22.3 | +9.8 | 59 |
| Contract Governance | 13.3 | 6.4 | +6.9 | 59 |
| Discoverability | 63.7 | 60.4 | +3.3 | 59 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.1 | 17.9 | +3.2 | 59 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.8 | 11.3 | +2.5 | 59 |
| Contract Quality | 16.5 | 17.5 | -1 | 59 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 16% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 25% | 9% | +16 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 13% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 drchrono 83.5
- 2 athenahealth 79.2
- 3 eClinicalWorks 74.9
- 4 Canvas Medical 70.1
- 5 Practice Fusion 61.8
- 6 Oracle Health (Cerner) 60.7
- 7 Lifen 59.4
- 8 ModMed 57.2
- 9 Athelas 56.5
- 10 Ritten 52.2
- 1 ModMed 52
- 2 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 3 Lifen 39.4
- 4 Practice Fusion 37.6
- 5 Alleva 36.9
- 6 Canvas Medical 36.7
- 7 drchrono 35.1
- 8 athenahealth 32.7
- 9 Ritten 31.5
- 10 Athelas 30.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/electronic-health-records"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/electronic-health-records"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/electronic-health-records/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.