Practice Management
Providers using this tag (83)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (14)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Practice Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 82 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Practice Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 40 | 26.5 | +13.5 | 82 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.4 | 13.7 | +5.7 | 82 |
| Contract Quality | 20.9 | 17.6 | +3.3 | 82 |
| Discoverability | 60.5 | 58.1 | +2.4 | 82 |
| Contract Governance | 8 | 6.3 | +1.7 | 82 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.7 | 23.2 | +0.5 | 82 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 drchrono 76.3
- 2 eClinicalWorks 69.7
- 3 athenahealth 69.1
- 4 ZnanyLekarz 68.1
- 5 Healthie 65.8
- 6 Dentsply Sirona 63.7
- 7 Tebra 58.9
- 8 Jane 58.2
- 9 LeanLaw 54.1
- 10 Halo Connect 53.8
- 1 Jane 50.9
- 2 Actionstep 50
- 3 ModMed 49.8
- 4 LeanLaw 42.3
- 5 ZnanyLekarz 41.1
- 6 AdvancedMD 40.4
- 7 eClinicalWorks 40.1
- 8 drchrono 38.3
- 9 Tebra 33.1
- 10 Rocket Matter 31.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.