Practice Management
Providers using this tag (81)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Practice Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 80 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Practice Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 39.7 | 26.5 | +13.2 | 80 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.1 | 14 | +6.1 | 80 |
| Contract Governance | 8.3 | 6.4 | +1.9 | 80 |
| Contract Quality | 21.2 | 19.8 | +1.4 | 80 |
| Discoverability | 62 | 61.2 | +0.8 | 80 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.9 | 23.4 | +0.5 | 80 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 10% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 drchrono 80.9
- 2 athenahealth 76.7
- 3 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 4 ZnanyLekarz 71.2
- 5 Healthie 68.2
- 6 Dentsply Sirona 65.6
- 7 Tebra 65.4
- 8 Halo Connect 57
- 9 Jane 57
- 10 LeanLaw 57
- 1 Jane 50.9
- 2 ModMed 49.8
- 3 LeanLaw 42.3
- 4 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 5 ZnanyLekarz 41.1
- 6 AdvancedMD 40.4
- 7 drchrono 35.1
- 8 Actionstep 33.8
- 9 Tebra 33.1
- 10 athenahealth 32.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.