Patient Engagement
Patient Engagementpatient-engagement
Providers using this tag (70)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 27 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 70 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Patient Engagement, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 27.9 | 22.3 | +5.6 | 70 |
| Contract Governance | 7.4 | 6.4 | +1 | 70 |
| Discoverability | 60.4 | 60.4 | 0 | 70 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.2 | 11.3 | -2.1 | 70 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.6 | 17.9 | -5.3 | 70 |
| Contract Quality | 8.9 | 17.5 | -8.6 | 70 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 16% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 7% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 9% | +1 |
| Security | 94% | 88% | +6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 13% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Healthie 68.5
- 2 Spruce Health 64.8
- 3 Tebra 62.2
- 4 AdvancedMD 58.3
- 5 Buoy Health 54.1
- 6 Artera 53.1
- 7 Luma Health 48.9
- 8 MedAdvisor 42.6
- 9 CharmHealth 41.9
- 10 HotDoc 40.7
- 1 Spruce Health 40
- 2 AdvancedMD 38.7
- 3 Buoy Health 36.9
- 4 Luma Health 29
- 5 CharmHealth 28.7
- 6 Tebra 28.7
- 7 Healthie 27.6
- 8 Artera 25.2
- 9 Curai 23.9
- 10 MedAdvisor 22.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.