Patient Engagement
Providers using this tag (76)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 30 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Patient Engagement” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 73 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Patient Engagement, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.7 | 26.5 | +2.2 | 73 |
| Contract Governance | 7.7 | 6.5 | +1.2 | 73 |
| Discoverability | 59.2 | 61 | -1.8 | 73 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.8 | 14 | -3.2 | 73 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.5 | 23.4 | -8.9 | 73 |
| Contract Quality | 8.3 | 20.1 | -11.8 | 73 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 13% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Healthie 68.2
- 2 Tebra 65.4
- 3 Spruce Health 64.2
- 4 Artera 52.8
- 5 Luma Health 51.2
- 6 Buoy Health 50.8
- 7 MedAdvisor 49.7
- 8 CharmHealth 40.6
- 9 HotDoc 39.6
- 10 AiCure 37.2
- 1 Spruce Health 48.4
- 2 Buoy Health 36.9
- 3 Tebra 33.1
- 4 Luma Health 29
- 5 CharmHealth 28.7
- 6 MedAdvisor 28.2
- 7 Healthie 27.6
- 8 Artera 25.2
- 9 Curai 23.9
- 10 Vi Labs 20.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.