EHR Integration
Providers using this tag (51)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “EHR Integration” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 51 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged EHR Integration, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 31.8 | 26.5 | +5.3 | 51 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 6.5 | +2.9 | 51 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.7 | 14 | -0.3 | 51 |
| Discoverability | 59.5 | 61 | -1.5 | 51 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17.6 | 23.4 | -5.8 | 51 |
| Contract Quality | 11.7 | 20.1 | -8.4 | 51 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 13% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Vim 64.4
- 2 Spruce Health 64.2
- 3 Suki AI 57.8
- 4 Artera 52.8
- 5 Predoc 48.9
- 6 Prosper AI 48.7
- 7 Heidi Health 48.2
- 8 Nabla 42.2
- 9 CodaMetrix 39.1
- 10 SMART Health IT 36
- 1 Vim 48.4
- 2 Spruce Health 48.4
- 3 Prosper AI 46.9
- 4 CodaMetrix 30.2
- 5 Artera 25.2
- 6 SMART Health IT 24.8
- 7 Predoc 23.6
- 8 Suki AI 23
- 9 Heidi Health 21
- 10 Caris Life Sciences 20
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.