EHR Integration
EHR Integrationehr-integration
Providers using this tag (53)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 53 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged EHR Integration, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.3 | 22.3 | +7 | 53 |
| Contract Governance | 9.5 | 6.4 | +3.1 | 53 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.6 | 11.3 | +2.3 | 53 |
| Discoverability | 61.1 | 60.4 | +0.7 | 53 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.7 | 17.9 | -1.2 | 53 |
| Contract Quality | 11.7 | 17.5 | -5.8 | 53 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 16% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 7% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 9% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 13% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Vim 68.2
- 2 Spruce Health 64.8
- 3 Suki AI 56.3
- 4 Artera 53.1
- 5 Heidi Health 49.4
- 6 Predoc 49.2
- 7 Prosper AI 48.8
- 8 Nabla 43.5
- 9 CodaMetrix 40.8
- 10 SMART Health IT 35.9
- 1 Vim 48.4
- 2 Prosper AI 46.9
- 3 Spruce Health 40
- 4 CodaMetrix 30.2
- 5 Artera 25.2
- 6 SMART Health IT 24.8
- 7 Predoc 23.6
- 8 Suki AI 20.9
- 9 Caris Life Sciences 20
- 10 Heidi Health 19.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.