FHIR
HL7 FHIRFHIR R4FHIR
Providers using this tag (169)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 25 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 39 Limited public surface area
Emerging 39 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (166)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 26 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 25 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 49 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “FHIR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
169 providers carry this tag directly, and 173 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 4 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 166 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged FHIR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.6 | 23.2 | +15.4 | 166 |
| Contract Quality | 29.7 | 17.6 | +12.1 | 166 |
| Access Clarity | 36.5 | 26.5 | +10 | 166 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.6 | 13.7 | +9.9 | 166 |
| Contract Governance | 15.1 | 6.3 | +8.8 | 166 |
| Discoverability | 65.8 | 58.1 | +7.7 | 166 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 14% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 41% | 11% | +30 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 79.1
- 2 Elation Health 77.5
- 3 drchrono 76.3
- 4 1upHealth 71.7
- 5 eClinicalWorks 69.7
- 6 athenahealth 69.1
- 7 Flexpa 67.8
- 8 NextGen Healthcare 66.7
- 9 Metriport 66.2
- 10 Healthie 65.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.