Patient Access
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (31)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Patient Access, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 34.9 | 17.5 | +17.4 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 19.4 | 6.4 | +13 | 46 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.8 | 17.9 | +12.9 | 46 |
| Access Clarity | 34.9 | 22.3 | +12.6 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 71.3 | 60.4 | +10.9 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.3 | 11.3 | +4 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 16% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 50% | 9% | +41 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 13% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Flexpa 76.4
- 2 1upHealth 76
- 3 NextGen Healthcare 75.7
- 4 Jefferson Health 71.1
- 5 Independence Blue Cross 70.9
- 6 Optum 63.4
- 7 Redox 62.1
- 8 Oracle Health (Cerner) 60.7
- 9 Temple Health 59.3
- 10 b.well 58
- 1 Flexpa 47.5
- 2 Prosper AI 46.9
- 3 Optum 42.6
- 4 Devoted Health 39.5
- 5 b.well 38.5
- 6 Jefferson Health 36.9
- 7 Temple Health 34.6
- 8 Sun Life 31.8
- 9 Clever Care Health Plan 30.2
- 10 AmeriHealth Caritas 29.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/patient-access"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/patient-access"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/patient-access/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.