SMART on FHIR
Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (27)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “SMART on FHIR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SMART on FHIR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46.3 | 19.8 | +26.5 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.1 | 23.4 | +23.7 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 47.9 | 26.5 | +21.4 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 21.8 | 6.4 | +15.4 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.1 | 14 | +15.1 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 70.8 | 61.2 | +9.6 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 10% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 78% | 11% | +67 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 14% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 87.4
- 2 Elation Health 83.7
- 3 drchrono 80.9
- 4 1upHealth 75.7
- 5 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 6 NextGen Healthcare 70.4
- 7 Jefferson Health 69.8
- 8 Health Gorilla 68.2
- 9 Independence Blue Cross 67
- 10 Medblocks 64.9
- 1 Medblocks 64.4
- 2 Medplum 52
- 3 ModMed 49.8
- 4 Centene 44.1
- 5 Health Gorilla 43.7
- 6 Aidbox 43.7
- 7 Elation Health 42.3
- 8 Cambio Healthcare Systems 42.3
- 9 Aetna 42.3
- 10 Commure 42.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.