Interoperability
Providers using this tag (175)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 22 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 44 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 24 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (85)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (31)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Interoperability” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 172 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Interoperability, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.6 | 23.4 | +12.2 | 172 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.8 | 14 | +8.8 | 172 |
| Contract Quality | 26.9 | 19.8 | +7.1 | 172 |
| Contract Governance | 12.8 | 6.4 | +6.4 | 172 |
| Access Clarity | 32.8 | 26.5 | +6.3 | 172 |
| Discoverability | 66.4 | 61.2 | +5.2 | 172 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 29% | 11% | +18 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 87.4
- 2 Elation Health 83.7
- 3 drchrono 80.9
- 4 athenahealth 76.7
- 5 1upHealth 75.7
- 6 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 7 NextGen Healthcare 70.4
- 8 Health Gorilla 68.2
- 9 Independence Blue Cross 67
- 10 Medblocks 64.9
- 1 Medblocks 64.4
- 2 xCures 59
- 3 Medplum 52
- 4 EHRbase 50
- 5 ModMed 49.8
- 6 Vim 48.4
- 7 Centene 44.1
- 8 Health Gorilla 43.7
- 9 Aidbox 43.7
- 10 Elation Health 42.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.