E-Prescribing (pharmacy, e-prescribing, medication data)

Where this market publishes its structure

• DirectTrust Accredited Organizations (accreditation.directtrust.org/accredited-organizations + detail pages; www.ehnac.org redirects here) machine-readable, 122 organizations, 24 with an e-Rx program; 2 linked (surescripts, optum); 23 held out-of-market / shared host; 6 without a website; the 22 other e-Rx holders have no catalog repo
• Drummond Group DEA EPCS certified products (drummondgroup.com/certified-products/epcs) machine-readable, 494 product rows (prescriber 127, pharmacy 44, integration 323), 417 companies; 11 linked; 10 end users + 2 out-of-market held by hand; 19 integration-only held out-of-market; 339 with no identity
• NCPDP Elite Partners (ncpdp.org/Members sponsor strip) machine-readable, 4 partners; 1 linked (surescripts), trade press held, CoverMyMeds and FDB not in catalog
• Surescripts certified software / Network Alliance participants not machine-readable: no public directory: the network-alliance page names no participants, /certified-solutions 404 (2026-10-20); site search is an Algolia index behind an embedded key, not used
• NCPDP member directory not machine-readable: member login
• DEA EPCS certified applications not machine-readable: no central list exists: DEA requires a third-party audit / certification and the certifying bodies publish their own; Drummond and DirectTrust read; iBeta's EPCS page lists no certified applications
• Bamboo Health partners (PDMP integration vendors) not machine-readable: plain GET answers a Cloudflare challenge; the page carries category blurbs and logos, no partner identities

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 77 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it

builds-on 2 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

regulated 5 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

standard 14 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

list 1 · a long list on its own page, mostly unevidenced

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 53 · declares nothing we can read: no number