openEHR
Providers using this tag (29)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged openEHR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 12.1 | 6.5 | +5.6 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.8 | 23.2 | +4.6 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 61 | 57.9 | +3.1 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.5 | 13 | +2.5 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 23.3 | 23.9 | -0.6 | 29 |
| Contract Quality | 15.9 | 17.2 | -1.3 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 12% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 0% | 16% | -16 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Nedap 61.7
- 2 Medblocks 61.6
- 3 Cadasto 55.5
- 4 DIPS 51.1
- 5 EHRbase 51.1
- 6 Cambio Healthcare Systems 50
- 7 vitagroup 49.5
- 8 CaboLabs 37.7
- 9 Ocean Health Systems 32.4
- 10 openEHR 28.1
- 1 Medblocks 66.3
- 2 EHRbase 46.1
- 3 Cambio Healthcare Systems 39.6
- 4 vitagroup 31.4
- 5 Nedap 29.8
- 6 DIPS 29.8
- 7 Cadasto 27.8
- 8 Ocean Health Systems 24.7
- 9 openEHR 17.3
- 10 CaboLabs 12.6
Coverage caveat. 29 of 29 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.