HIPAA
Providers using this tag (127)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 70 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “HIPAA” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 126 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged HIPAA, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 41.8 | 26.5 | +15.3 | 126 |
| Contract Governance | 11.8 | 6.4 | +5.4 | 126 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.9 | 14 | +3.9 | 126 |
| Discoverability | 60.8 | 61.2 | -0.4 | 126 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.8 | 23.4 | -0.6 | 126 |
| Contract Quality | 18.4 | 19.8 | -1.4 | 126 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 10% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 87.4
- 2 Stedi 83.1
- 3 drchrono 80.9
- 4 Svix 80.4
- 5 Vital 73.9
- 6 Availity 73.3
- 7 Paubox 71.5
- 8 Amigo 67.2
- 9 Spruce Health 64.9
- 10 123FormBuilder 64.2
- 1 Paubox 61.5
- 2 xCures 59
- 3 Stedi 55.9
- 4 Turquoise Health 53.8
- 5 Medplum 52
- 6 Svix 49.4
- 7 Spruce Health 48.4
- 8 Amigo 46.7
- 9 Synthflow 42.1
- 10 Vital 40.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.