Telehealth
TelemedicineTelehealth
Providers using this tag (346)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 167 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 129 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (14)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Telehealth” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
346 providers carry this tag directly, and 351 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 5 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 330 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Telehealth, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.8 | 26.5 | +2.3 | 330 |
| Contract Governance | 4.1 | 6.5 | -2.4 | 330 |
| Discoverability | 55.8 | 61 | -5.2 | 330 |
| Operational Transparency | 5.6 | 14 | -8.4 | 330 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.3 | 23.4 | -12.1 | 330 |
| Contract Quality | 5.8 | 20.1 | -14.3 | 330 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 10% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 13% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 drchrono 81.8
- 2 ZnanyLekarz 72.2
- 3 Healthie 68.2
- 4 Spruce Health 64.2
- 5 Zocdoc 64.1
- 6 Autoderm – AI Dermatology API 63.5
- 7 DoseSpot 62.8
- 8 OK Capsule 60.6
- 9 Truepill 58.2
- 10 ModMed 57.5
- 1 OK Capsule 52
- 2 Jane 50.9
- 3 ModMed 49.8
- 4 Zocdoc 49
- 5 Spruce Health 48.4
- 6 ZnanyLekarz 41.1
- 7 drchrono 38.3
- 8 Buoy Health 36.9
- 9 Truepill 35
- 10 LetsGetChecked 34.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.