Virtual Care
Providers using this tag (51)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Virtual Care” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Virtual Care, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 30.5 | 26.5 | +4 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 6.8 | 6.5 | +0.3 | 50 |
| Discoverability | 57.2 | 61 | -3.8 | 50 |
| Operational Transparency | 5.9 | 14 | -8.1 | 50 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.6 | 23.4 | -10.8 | 50 |
| Contract Quality | 7.2 | 20.1 | -12.9 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 10% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 13% | -13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Canvas Medical 67.8
- 2 Color 52.6
- 3 Coviu 50.8
- 4 DexCare 50.1
- 5 Teladoc 48.3
- 6 Abi Global Health 39.5
- 7 Amwell 27.4
- 8 Recuro Health 26.5
- 9 PlushCare 24.5
- 10 Wheel 23.7
- 1 Color 43.7
- 2 Canvas Medical 37.9
- 3 Coviu 32.5
- 4 Abi Global Health 28.1
- 5 DexCare 27.2
- 6 Teladoc 25.2
- 7 Eden Health 16.5
- 8 Recuro Health 15.1
- 9 Amwell 5
- 10 PlushCare 2.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.