Employee Benefits
Providers using this tag (180)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 97 Early or largely undocumented
FormaSymetra FinancialBenepassBennieTriNet GroupBenPasitoYulifeNewfrontMinuLumityEmployee NavigatorCarrum HealthAcrisureSharebiteScripta InsightsRightwayInsperityLegal & GeneralSolera HealthCanada LifeArthur J. GallagherbswiftGravieCollective HealthianacareSmithRxLincoln NationalFirefly HealthBlue Cross CanadaGartenSideCareTava HealthVitalityModern HealthAngle HealthOrigin FinancialPrescienceNilo HealthGuardian LifeSana BenefitsThreeFlowHealthJoyBayzatVida HealthCocoonEIS GroupElevateLivelyMORE HealthStack HealthBippitHowden GroupCarrotAccessHopeAware HealthFamily FirstLanternSecurian Financial GroupAdvance Tech LendingPeppyADP Workforce NowEbixEmpathyJifyKeep FinancialAirvetEAT ClubWellTheoryMutual of OmahaFertifaLocktonSalt LabsMayBrightsideFoodsmartRadish HealthMilu HealthBrown & BrownAccoladeAllCareCentivoHealthEquityHrmonySimplyinsuredBrightPlanSpring HealthElectric Car SchemeHappypalNova BenefitsOnzeRiver HealthKinsideAura FinanceSummerGuildXP Health
Minimal 41 Almost no public developer surface
Beam DentalEquitableBeniComptNava BenefitsStanCorp Financial GroupArtemis HealthNuevo MétodoWellBenefitBayEdme Insurance BrokersReliance HealthCome BienCariloopPaynasRightway HealthcareMorgan LewisLoop HealthOnsitedentalOvia HealthLyra HealthNorthstarVoya FinancialBetterflySALARY HEROTruverisHomethriveLIMRAAlanSwileKarpatia BenefitsBright Horizons Family SolutionsTokaido HealthWagmoAlightNowpayPoppins HealthDechertLendtablePlerkTaskHuman
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Employee Navigator Partner APIThe Employee Navigator partner REST API program — the Company Integration API and the Company Benefit Detai...bswift Partner APIbswift's partner-facing REST API, served from an AWS API Gateway at api.bswift.com. bswift publicly describ...Symetra Benefits Administration APISymetra's Benefits Administration API enables HR platforms, benefits administrators, and technology partner...Mutual of Omaha Benefits Administration APIsMutual of Omaha's Workplace Solutions API program for group and voluntary benefits, delivered to brokers an...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
61.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
22.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
14.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
180 providers carry this tag directly, and 188 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 8 more to reach.
Related tags
Benefits 30 co-occurrences
Health Insurance 36 co-occurrences
Payroll 42 co-occurrences
Human Resources 64 co-occurrences
Benefits Administration 19 co-occurrences
Insurance 67 co-occurrences
Health Plans 15 co-occurrences
Life Insurance 15 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag181
Api tag7
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag1
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| HR and Payroll | 40% |
| HCM and Payroll Marketplaces (ADP, Workday, UKG, Paylocity) | 26% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 174 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Employee Benefits, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
174
of 180 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
8.2
-3.8 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 174 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 5Developing 20Thin 13Emerging 87Minimal 49
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.5 | 23.9 | +5.6 | 174 |
| Contract Governance | 7.3 | 6.5 | +0.8 | 174 |
| Discoverability | 57 | 57.9 | -0.9 | 174 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.3 | 13 | -4.7 | 174 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.5 | 23.2 | -6.7 | 174 |
| Contract Quality | 10.1 | 17.2 | -7.1 | 174 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 13% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 16% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Remote
- 2 Kota
- 3 Employment Hero
- 4 Smart Pension
- 5 Namely
- 6 LeO
- 7 Buk
- 8 Nayya
- 9 Workday Benefits
- 10 Zywave
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 401GO {"score" => 47.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 Buk {"score" => 47, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 PlanSource {"score" => 46.4, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Color {"score" => 44.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 Zywave {"score" => 44, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 6 Kota {"score" => 43.2, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 7 Justworks {"score" => 41.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 8 Aflac {"score" => 38.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 Employment Hero {"score" => 37.9, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 Ease {"score" => 36.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
All 180 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 174 carry a score (97%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 166 of 174 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 166 of 174 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.