Employee Benefits
Providers using this tag (160)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 84 Early or largely undocumented
Legal & GeneralEmployee NavigatorSharebiteCarrum HealthRecuro HealthCanada LifeScripta InsightsAcrisureBupa AustraliaSolera HealthRightwaybswiftSymetra FinancialGartenGravieSmithRxVitalityCollective HealthFirefly HealthBlue Cross CanadaSideCareModern HealthPrescienceFormaBenepassTriNet GroupElevateVida HealthSana BenefitsThreeFlowAngle HealthGuardian LifeEIS GroupHealthJoyMORE HealthHowden GroupBenLivelyOrigin FinancialTava HealthSecurian Financial GroupCocoonStack HealthCarrotFamily FirstAccessHopeBippitEbixAdvance Tech LendingianacarePeppyYulifeLanternEmpathyPasitoJifyKeep FinancialNewfrontMayMutual of OmahaBrightsideMinuFertifaWellTheorySalt LabsAllCareLocktonSpring HealthNova BenefitsKinsideRiver HealthEAT ClubBrightPlanFoodsmartHrmonyRadish HealthAura FinanceEquitableBrown & BrownAccoladeCentivoElectric Car SchemeSimplyinsuredHealthEquity
Minimal 47 Almost no public developer surface
StanCorp Financial GroupOnzeHappypalXP HealthNuevo MétodoWellGuildMilu HealthSummerBeniEdme Insurance BrokersReliance HealthCome BienLumityNava BenefitsLIMRARightway HealthcareAirvetArtemis HealthBeam DentalLoop HealthMorgan LewisOnsitedentalOvia HealthLyra HealthPaynasNorthstarAware HealthNilo HealthBetterflySALARY HEROTruverisHomethriveComptAlanKarpatia BenefitsSwileBright Horizons Family SolutionsTokaido HealthWagmoAlightNowpayPoppins HealthDechertLendtablePlerkTaskHuman
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Employee Navigator Partner APIThe Employee Navigator partner REST API program — the Company Integration API and the Company Benefit Detai...bswift Partner APIbswift's partner-facing REST API, served from an AWS API Gateway at api.bswift.com. bswift publicly describ...Symetra Benefits Administration APISymetra's Benefits Administration API enables HR platforms, benefits administrators, and technology partner...Mutual of Omaha Benefits Administration APIsMutual of Omaha's Workplace Solutions API program for group and voluntary benefits, delivered to brokers an...Equitable Benefits Plan Setup APIAn API capability that acts as a digital bridge between systems, enabling automatic creation and configurat...
Score breakdown
Frequency
61.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
22.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
10.7
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
160 providers carry this tag directly, and 168 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 8 more to reach.
Related tags
Health Insurance 36 co-occurrences
Benefits Administration 19 co-occurrences
Payroll 30 co-occurrences
Human Resources 49 co-occurrences
Insurance 62 co-occurrences
Health Plans 15 co-occurrences
Life Insurance 15 co-occurrences
Financial Wellness 11 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag160
Api tag7
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag1
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 154 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Employee Benefits, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
154
of 160 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
18.7
-4.2 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
6.4
-5.5 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
0–60.8
median 15.2 · σ 12.9
How the 154 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 2Developing 18Thin 8Emerging 82Minimal 44
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 30.2 | 26.5 | +3.7 | 154 |
| Contract Governance | 6.8 | 6.3 | +0.5 | 154 |
| Discoverability | 55.8 | 58.1 | -2.3 | 154 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.8 | 13.7 | -6.9 | 154 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.5 | 23.2 | -8.7 | 154 |
| Contract Quality | 7.5 | 17.6 | -10.1 | 154 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Kota 60.8
- 2 Smart Pension 59.7
- 3 Workday Benefits 52.6
- 4 Nayya 51
- 5 Calm 50
- 6 Color 49
- 7 Justworks 46.6
- 8 PlanSource 45.4
- 9 LeO 45.3
- 10 ADP 44.8
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 PlanSource 45.1
- 2 Justworks 42
- 3 Color 41.5
- 4 Kota 39.9
- 5 Smart Pension 38.2
- 6 Aflac 36.3
- 7 ADP 35.4
- 8 Ease 35.2
- 9 Workday Benefits 34.4
- 10 Sun Life 31.8
All 160 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 154 carry a score (96%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 149 of 154 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 149 of 154 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.