Human Resources
HRHR TechHuman ResourceHuman Resources
Providers using this tag (455)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 68 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 77 Limited public surface area
Emerging 160 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 133 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (73)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (20)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Human Resources” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
455 providers carry this tag directly, and 573 counting the 15 narrower tags below and the 1 beneath them — 118 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 429 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Human Resources, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 33 | 26.5 | +6.5 | 429 |
| Discoverability | 58.8 | 58.1 | +0.7 | 429 |
| Contract Quality | 17.6 | 17.6 | 0 | 429 |
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.3 | -0.4 | 429 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.3 | 13.7 | -0.4 | 429 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.4 | 23.2 | -3.8 | 429 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Remote 73.7
- 2 Zoho 65.1
- 3 Visier 64.4
- 4 Visma 64.2
- 5 Deel 63.7
- 6 Workday Business Processes 63.3
- 7 360Learning 62.6
- 8 Sense Talent Labs 62.5
- 9 Connecteam 62.3
- 10 Kota 60.8
- 1 Workera 58.1
- 2 KarmaCheck 55.1
- 3 HeyMilo 52.3
- 4 Factorial 51
- 5 Deel 48.6
- 6 DailyPay 48.4
- 7 Greenhouse 47.1
- 8 Buk 46.9
- 9 Keka HR 46.7
- 10 Checkr 46.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.