Human Resources
HRHR TechHuman ResourceHuman Resources
Providers using this tag (457)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 61 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 170 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 135 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (73)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (21)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Human Resources” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
457 providers carry this tag directly, and 717 counting the 16 narrower tags below and the 2 beneath them — 260 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| HR and Payroll | 76% |
| HCM and Payroll Marketplaces (ADP, Workday, UKG, Paylocity) | 61% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 430 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Human Resources, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 30.5 | 23.9 | +6.6 | 430 |
| Discoverability | 58.9 | 57.9 | +1 | 430 |
| Contract Quality | 18 | 17.2 | +0.8 | 430 |
| Contract Governance | 6.6 | 6.5 | +0.1 | 430 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.3 | 13 | -0.7 | 430 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.7 | 23.2 | -3.5 | 430 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 16% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Culture Amp 66.6
- 2 Remote 66.3
- 3 Visier 65
- 4 Visma 64.7
- 5 360Learning 63.8
- 6 Connecteam 62.9
- 7 Fama 62.5
- 8 Sense Talent Labs 62.5
- 9 Workday Business Processes 62.3
- 10 Zoho 61.9
- 1 Workera 58.7
- 2 KarmaCheck 54.1
- 3 HeyMilo 53.2
- 4 Check 49.5
- 5 Factorial 48.5
- 6 DailyPay 47.8
- 7 401GO 47.8
- 8 Keka HR 47.8
- 9 Buk 47
- 10 PlanSource 46.4
Coverage caveat. 395 of 430 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.