Human Resources
HRHR TechHuman ResourceHuman Resources
Providers using this tag (501)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 33 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 57 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 78 Limited public surface area
Emerging 182 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 138 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (74)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (20)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Human Resources” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
501 providers carry this tag directly, and 836 counting the 16 narrower tags below and the 2 beneath them — 335 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| HR and Payroll | 76% |
| HCM and Payroll Marketplaces (ADP, Workday, UKG, Paylocity) | 61% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 463 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Human Resources, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 36 | 30 | +6 | 463 |
| Discoverability | 59.5 | 59.1 | +0.4 | 463 |
| Contract Governance | 9.9 | 9.7 | +0.2 | 463 |
| Contract Quality | 18.7 | 18.6 | +0.1 | 463 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.9 | 13.2 | -0.3 | 463 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.4 | 24.5 | -3.1 | 463 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 18% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 16% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Security | 98% | 99% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 35% | 36% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Greenhouse 77.3
- 2 Employment Hero 70.7
- 3 Remote 70.4
- 4 Culture Amp 68.9
- 5 360Learning 68.6
- 6 Visier 68.6
- 7 Connecteam 68.4
- 8 recruitmcp-com 68.3
- 9 Fama 67.6
- 10 Deputy 67.1
- 1 recruitmcp-com 70.3
- 2 Greenhouse 58.8
- 3 Workera 58.7
- 4 KarmaCheck 55.8
- 5 HeyMilo 53.2
- 6 Deel 51.7
- 7 HollyHR 50.7
- 8 Check 49.5
- 9 Factorial 48.5
- 10 Bitrix24 48.5
Coverage caveat. 412 of 463 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.