Recruiting
RecruitmentRecruiting
Providers using this tag (216)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 77 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 81 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (42)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (17)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Recruiting” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
216 providers carry this tag directly, and 236 counting the 3 narrower tags below — 20 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 201 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Recruiting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.1 | 26.5 | +2.6 | 201 |
| Discoverability | 57.3 | 58.1 | -0.8 | 201 |
| Contract Governance | 4.5 | 6.3 | -1.8 | 201 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.3 | 13.7 | -3.4 | 201 |
| Contract Quality | 13.7 | 17.6 | -3.9 | 201 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17 | 23.2 | -6.2 | 201 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 LinkedIn 75.7
- 2 Remote 73.7
- 3 Drippay 72
- 4 AI Applyd 66.3
- 5 RocketReach 62.6
- 6 Sense Talent Labs 62.5
- 7 Affinda 60.4
- 8 Worklittle 53
- 9 Buk 51
- 10 HeyMilo 50.8
- 1 Drippay 64.2
- 2 RocketReach 58.3
- 3 Affinda 54.2
- 4 Worklittle 53.6
- 5 HeyMilo 52.3
- 6 Greenhouse 47.1
- 7 Buk 46.9
- 8 Checkr 46.3
- 9 Offendersearch API 45.4
- 10 PeopleForce 44.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.