Applicant Tracking
Providers using this tag (38)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Applicant Tracking” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 37 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Applicant Tracking, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 35.8 | 26.5 | +9.3 | 37 |
| Discoverability | 69.6 | 61 | +8.6 | 37 |
| Contract Quality | 28.6 | 20.1 | +8.5 | 37 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.2 | 23.4 | +7.8 | 37 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.2 | 14 | +3.2 | 37 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.5 | +2.6 | 37 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 13% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 13% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Sense Talent Labs 60.7
- 2 Namely 56.9
- 3 HR Partner 51.8
- 4 WizeHire 50.1
- 5 KolayIK 48.3
- 6 Trakstar 46.3
- 7 Phenom 44.4
- 8 Employ Inc 42.7
- 9 Workstream 42.7
- 10 micro1 42.4
- 1 Personio 40.3
- 2 Sense Talent Labs 37.6
- 3 micro1 36
- 4 Fountain 34.5
- 5 Yello 32.7
- 6 Wellfound 32.7
- 7 Employ Inc 31.5
- 8 WizeHire 30.8
- 9 Harver 30.4
- 10 KolayIK 29
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.