Behavioral Health
Providers using this tag (99)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 57 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
99 providers carry this tag directly, and 201 counting the 3 narrower tags below and the 2 beneath them — 102 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 95 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Behavioral Health, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.9 | 26.5 | +2.4 | 95 |
| Contract Governance | 5.4 | 6.3 | -0.9 | 95 |
| Discoverability | 54.8 | 58.1 | -3.3 | 95 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.9 | 13.7 | -8.8 | 95 |
| Contract Quality | 4.9 | 17.6 | -12.7 | 95 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10.5 | 23.2 | -12.7 | 95 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 14% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 12% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Independence Blue Cross 62.5
- 2 Ritten 49.7
- 3 Teladoc 46.2
- 4 Brellium 41.4
- 5 Alleva 41.2
- 6 AmeriHealth Caritas 41.1
- 7 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 38.4
- 8 Forta Health 36.6
- 9 CentralReach 36.5
- 10 Netsmart 35.7
- 1 Independence Blue Cross 36.5
- 2 Ritten 31.5
- 3 Alleva 30.4
- 4 AmeriHealth Caritas 29.9
- 5 Forta Health 27.3
- 6 Teladoc 25.2
- 7 Brellium 23.2
- 8 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 21.5
- 9 Nirvana Health 19.8
- 10 Recuro Health 15.1
Coverage caveat. 91 of 95 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.