Health
Providers using this tag (739)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 293 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 318 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (979)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 69 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 155 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 341 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 296 Limited public surface area
Emerging 90 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 28 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (927)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Health” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 927 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 645 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Health, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 55.5 | 59.1 | -3.6 | 645 |
| Access Clarity | 26.3 | 30 | -3.7 | 645 |
| Contract Governance | 5.7 | 9.7 | -4 | 645 |
| Operational Transparency | 5.9 | 13.2 | -7.3 | 645 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.5 | 24.5 | -10 | 645 |
| Contract Quality | 7.9 | 18.6 | -10.7 | 645 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 18% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 16% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 36% | -21 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Health Gorilla 75.7
- 2 hi.health 73
- 3 Medblocks 65.5
- 4 xCures 62.7
- 5 b.well 61.5
- 6 Fitbit 61.5
- 7 Verifiable 60.5
- 8 EGYM 59.5
- 9 Atmospore Pollen Forecasts 59
- 10 OK Capsule 58.6
- 1 Medblocks 66.3
- 2 xCures 59.5
- 3 b.well 58.6
- 4 BodySpec 53.8
- 5 Mandatory Training 53.6
- 6 anpheros-com 52.9
- 7 hi.health 52.7
- 8 OK Capsule 51.9
- 9 EGYM 50.5
- 10 Aignostics 48.9
Coverage caveat. 616 of 645 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.