Veterinary & Pet Care

Where this market publishes its structure

• ezyVet integrations (ezyvet.com/integrations, page __NEXT_DATA__) machine-readable, 108 listings, names + categories + countries, no partner website; 4 in-market partners linked (2 Wikidata/domain, 2 register-name hand-reviewed)
• Provet Cloud integrations (provet.com/integrations) machine-readable, 72 cards with the partner's own site; 6 in-market partners linked; 63 domains not in the catalog
• Digitail integrations (digitail.com/integrations/) machine-readable, 49 cards (deduped by domain), 30 with an external site; 5 in-market partners linked
• Shepherd integrations (shepherd.vet/integrations/) not machine-readable: readable but names only, and Shepherd the PIMS has no catalog repo (all/shepherd is Shepherd Insurance); harvest candidate
• Instinct integrations (instinct.vet/integrations/) not machine-readable: names in logos only; no catalog repo for Instinct Science (instinct-xyz is a different company)
• Covetrus Pulse / AVImark integration partners not machine-readable: no public partner list; covetrus.com integration paths 404; 'industry partners' page is membership organisations
• IDEXX Neo / Cornerstone integration partners not machine-readable: idexx.com integration-partner paths 404; list not published
• Vetspire integrations not machine-readable: vetspire.com redirects to vetspire.ai; no integrations page
• AAHA accredited practices not machine-readable: practices are end users: held by design
• pet insurance regulators not machine-readable: no integration or conformance register

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-21 from the 113 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 3 · other companies invest to build on it

builds-on 10 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

standard 10 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges

undeclared 89 · declares nothing we can read: no number