Claims
Providers using this tag (125)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 50 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (88)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 32 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (45)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Claims” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 123 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Claims, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 31.6 | 26.5 | +5.1 | 123 |
| Contract Governance | 11.1 | 6.3 | +4.8 | 123 |
| Discoverability | 61.1 | 58.1 | +3 | 123 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.8 | 23.2 | +2.6 | 123 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.4 | 13.7 | +0.7 | 123 |
| Contract Quality | 17.4 | 17.6 | -0.2 | 123 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 14% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 12% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 11% | +16 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Stedi 59.5
- 2 Socotra 52.3
- 3 Flume Health 51.2
- 4 SuperDial 42.1
- 5 AmTrust Financial Services 41.5
- 6 Guidewire 40.5
- 7 CMS — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 39.1
- 8 Optum 38.9
- 9 Qoala 36.7
- 10 Aflac 36.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.