Claims
Claimsclaims
Providers using this tag (121)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 44 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (97)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (51)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Claims” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 51 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 119 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Claims, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.2 | 26.5 | +5.7 | 119 |
| Contract Governance | 11.3 | 6.4 | +4.9 | 119 |
| Discoverability | 64.1 | 61.2 | +2.9 | 119 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.2 | 23.4 | +2.8 | 119 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.6 | 14 | +0.6 | 119 |
| Contract Quality | 18.7 | 19.8 | -1.1 | 119 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 10% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Stedi 55.9
- 2 SuperDial 42.1
- 3 Optum 40.8
- 4 Guidewire 40.5
- 5 ACKO General Insurance 39.9
- 6 Qoala 38.8
- 7 Candid Health 38.3
- 8 Aflac 36.3
- 9 Socotra 36.1
- 10 Flume Health 35
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.