France AMF Asset-Management Register (GECO)
Regulated register market (amf geco authorised asset-management companies). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- AMF GECO (geco.amf-france.org back-office/thirdParties public JSON) machine-readable, 666 live French SGPs (401 with website, LEI + SIREN per firm); 1 linked (serena); 2 subsidiaries held; 1 out of market; 240 non-French managers context
- AMF DASP / PSAN lists (amf-france.org/en/professionals/fintech/my-relations-amf/obtain-dasp-authorisation) not machine-readable: 301 -> list-dasps-delisted (struck-off firms, not a licence source); authorised CASPs are the AMF white list PSCA rows read by france-regafi-acpr
- REGAFI (regafi.fr) machine-readable, read by france-regafi-acpr (Opendatasoft API; old SPIP results URL 404); not re-read, edges reused
- AMF white list (PSCA / PSFP) machine-readable, read by france-regafi-acpr; not re-read, edges reused
- ORIAS intermediary register (orias.fr) not machine-readable: 200 but search behind a CAPTCHA (re-checked 2026-10-22); not bypassed
- ESMA upreg / MiCA CASP, EBA PIR machine-readable, read by capital-markets / crypto / eu-psd2-payment-institutions; not re-read
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 4 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | France 100%, Fintech 75% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | Fintech 75%, Energy 50%, Wealth Management 50%, Education 25%, Insurance 25%, Infrastructure 25%, Sustainability 25%, LLM 25% |
| Industries | Investing & Venture Capital 75%, Financial Technology 50%, Financial Services 50%, Artificial Intelligence 25%, Climate & Sustainability 25%, Insurance 25% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
undeclared 4 · declares nothing we can read: no number
Generated 2026-10-23 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.