Trading
Providers using this tag (276)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 63 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 90 Limited public surface area
Emerging 47 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 60 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (137)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 54 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (20)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Trading” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 264 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Trading, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.4 | 23.2 | +14.2 | 264 |
| Contract Quality | 27.3 | 17.6 | +9.7 | 264 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.8 | 13.7 | +7.1 | 264 |
| Discoverability | 64.4 | 58.1 | +6.3 | 264 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.3 | +1.9 | 264 |
| Access Clarity | 28.4 | 26.5 | +1.9 | 264 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 14% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kraken 68
- 2 Gemini Trust Company 67.5
- 3 AlphaAI 66.7
- 4 Crypto.com 65
- 5 Cymetica 63.1
- 6 Bullish 60.8
- 7 Clear Street 60.5
- 8 ThetaData 59.8
- 9 Adanos Market Sentiment API 59.7
- 10 invinoveritas 58.6
- 1 AlphaAI 66
- 2 Cymetica 63.3
- 3 Clear Street 63.2
- 4 invinoveritas 62.7
- 5 Xpansiv 56.6
- 6 Alpaca 54.2
- 7 Gemini Trust Company 50.1
- 8 Anchorage Digital 47.5
- 9 Paxos 46.5
- 10 Crypto.com 45.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.