WebSocket
WebSocketWebsocketwebsocket
Providers using this tag (219)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 79 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 77 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (235)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 16 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 76 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 82 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 219 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged WebSocket, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46 | 17.5 | +28.5 | 219 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.6 | 17.9 | +18.7 | 219 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.7 | 11.3 | +17.4 | 219 |
| Access Clarity | 35.4 | 22.3 | +13.1 | 219 |
| Discoverability | 72.9 | 60.4 | +12.5 | 219 |
| Contract Governance | 13.2 | 6.4 | +6.8 | 219 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 16% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 7% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 9% | 0 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 53% | 13% | +40 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Twelve Data 76.7
- 2 Polygon 71.5
- 3 Kraken 70.6
- 4 Heroic Labs 70.4
- 5 fal 69.7
- 6 Bullish 67.3
- 7 8x8 67.1
- 8 SiftingIO 66.1
- 9 Amazon API Gateway 65.8
- 10 Solana 65.8
- 1 S&P Global 63.7
- 2 CryptoCompare 60.2
- 3 Polygon 57.3
- 4 Morningstar 56.8
- 5 Lukka 52
- 6 Twelve Data 48.7
- 7 Tradier 45.5
- 8 BuiltWith 45
- 9 8x8 43.3
- 10 SiftingIO 41.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/websocket"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/websocket"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/websocket/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.