Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Capital Markets and Trading

Register market (iso 10383 mic, esma) plus market-data venue coverage. The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

31providers measured

1 (3.2%)declare their own

22 (71.0%)covered by others only

8 (25.8%)undeclared

0in-market workflows shown

Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

ISO 10383 Market Identifier Codes (iso20022.org ISO10383_MIC.csv) machine-readable
ESMA registers: MiFID/AIFMD/UCITS entities (esma_registers_upreg Solr) machine-readable, 128 of 13,898 entities carry a website
ESMA Benchmarks Regulation administrators (esma_registers_bench_entities Solr) machine-readable
Twelve Data exchange coverage (api.twelvedata.com/exchanges) machine-readable
SEC EDGAR company data not machine-readable: fair-access policy requires a declared contact; no company domains
FINRA BrokerCheck not machine-readable: no public API; no firm websites
ESMA CRA register not machine-readable: no public Solr core located
Polygon/Massive, EODHD, Finnhub, Databento exchange lists not machine-readable: keyed

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-15 from the 31 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

Tags	Market Data 74%, Trading 55%, Stocks 48%, Real-Time 39%, Finance 39%, Financial Data 32%, Financial Services 29%, Investing 29%, Fintech 26%, Cryptocurrency 23%, Reference Data 23%
Tag groups	Real-Time 94%, Fintech 42%, Finance 39%, Wealth Management 29%, Blockchain 23%
Industries	Investing & Venture Capital 84%, Financial Technology 48%, Financial Services 29%, Blockchain, Crypto & Web3 23%

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Twelve Data	46.0	10	0 / 10	0	0	0	coverage 100%

covered 5 · reached mainly through aggregators

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Mix
Cboe Global Markets	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	standard 50%, covered 50%
Deutsche Börse	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	standard 50%, covered 50%
JPX (Japan Exchange Group)	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	standard 50%, covered 50%
Nasdaq	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	standard 50%, covered 50%
Alpaca	10.3 thin	1	0 / 1	covered 100%

regulated 8 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Mix
Intercontinental Exchange	55.6	3	0 / 3	contract 67%, standard 33%
Robinhood	41.2 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 100%
Trading 212	39.2 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, standard 50%
Clearstream	37.1 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, standard 50%
Bloomberg	36.4 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, standard 50%
CME Group	36.4 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, standard 50%
London Stock Exchange Group	36.4 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, standard 50%
Morningstar	36.4 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, standard 50%

standard 7 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Mix
Charles Schwab	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%
Clear Street	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%
DriveWealth	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%
FINRA	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%
Interactive Brokers	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%
MarketAxess	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%
Tradeweb	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	standard 100%

mixed 2 · no single mode dominates

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Euronext	53.7	3	0 / 3	0	0	0	contract 33%, standard 33%, covered 33%
SIX	53.7	3	0 / 3	0	0	0	contract 33%, standard 33%, covered 33%

undeclared 8 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge
Alpha Vantage	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Databento	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Factset	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Finnhub	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Massive (formerly Polygon.io)	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Refinitiv	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Tiingo	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Tradier	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-

Generated 2026-10-15 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.