Financial Data
Providers using this tag (160)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 40 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 52 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (82)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (28)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Financial Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
160 providers carry this tag directly, and 468 counting the 2 narrower tags below and the 1 beneath them — 308 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Capital Markets and Trading | 35% |
| Private Markets and Fund Administration (ILPA, broker-dealer registration, options market-data vendors) | 34% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 157 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Financial Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36 | 18.6 | +17.4 | 157 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.4 | 24.5 | +16.9 | 157 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.1 | 13.2 | +10.9 | 157 |
| Access Clarity | 39.2 | 30 | +9.2 | 157 |
| Discoverability | 66.9 | 59.1 | +7.8 | 157 |
| Contract Governance | 16.2 | 9.7 | +6.5 | 157 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 38% | 18% | +20 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 38% | 16% | +22 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 13% | +9 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 1% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 64% | 36% | +28 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Pluggy 75.3
- 2 Basiq 73.6
- 3 Financial Modeling Prep 69
- 4 Wealth Reader 67.3
- 5 Twelve Data 66.9
- 6 MX Technologies 66.7
- 7 SiftingIO 65.3
- 8 TradingView 65
- 9 ByKaranteli 63.5
- 10 Rutter 62.2
- 1 Sirenic 75.6
- 2 S&P Global 65.1
- 3 Daloopa 64.6
- 4 Caplight 60.7
- 5 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 59.9
- 6 Pluggy 59.4
- 7 Twelve Data 58.9
- 8 Trading Economics 55.4
- 9 EODHD 54.4
- 10 Insourcia 54.3
Coverage caveat. 102 of 157 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.