Financial Data
Financial DataFinancialdatafinancial datafinancial-data
Providers using this tag (135)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 42 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 41 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (100)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 40 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (33)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Financial Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 134 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Financial Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36.8 | 19.8 | +17 | 134 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.6 | 23.4 | +13.2 | 134 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.7 | 14 | +11.7 | 134 |
| Access Clarity | 38.2 | 26.5 | +11.7 | 134 |
| Discoverability | 69 | 61.2 | +7.8 | 134 |
| Contract Governance | 10.5 | 6.4 | +4.1 | 134 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 10% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 29% | 13% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 14% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 MX Technologies 75.6
- 2 Twelve Data 73.3
- 3 Factset 67.7
- 4 Financial Modeling Prep 66.6
- 5 S&P Global 65.7
- 6 Market Data 65
- 7 SiftingIO 63.9
- 8 Pennylane 62.6
- 9 Wealth Reader 61.4
- 10 StockData 60.6
- 1 S&P Global 63.7
- 2 Caplight 62.3
- 3 Twelve Data 58.4
- 4 Lean Technologies 53.2
- 5 Factset 52.8
- 6 SnowSignals 51.6
- 7 drillr Public Data API 51.1
- 8 Kensho 51.1
- 9 Intrinio 46.8
- 10 Bud Financial 46.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.