Financial Data
Providers using this tag (138)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 46 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (84)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (29)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Financial Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
138 providers carry this tag directly, and 367 counting the 2 narrower tags below and the 1 beneath them — 229 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 137 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Financial Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 35.3 | 17.6 | +17.7 | 137 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.4 | 23.2 | +16.2 | 137 |
| Access Clarity | 39.9 | 26.5 | +13.4 | 137 |
| Operational Transparency | 26 | 13.7 | +12.3 | 137 |
| Discoverability | 66.2 | 58.1 | +8.1 | 137 |
| Contract Governance | 11.7 | 6.3 | +5.4 | 137 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 14% | +19 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 12% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 75.8
- 2 MX Technologies 71
- 3 Twelve Data 69
- 4 S&P Global 66.9
- 5 ByKaranteli 64
- 6 Financial Modeling Prep 63.2
- 7 Factset 63
- 8 Wealth Reader 61.8
- 9 SiftingIO 61.1
- 10 Market Data 61
- 1 Sirenic 70.9
- 2 S&P Global 66.2
- 3 Caplight 62.3
- 4 Twelve Data 62
- 5 Daloopa 61.5
- 6 Trading Economics 58.8
- 7 EODHD 57.6
- 8 Morningstar 56.8
- 9 Lean Technologies 53.2
- 10 Factset 52.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.