Foreign Exchange
Foreign ExchangeForeign exchange
Providers using this tag (55)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (31)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Foreign Exchange” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Foreign Exchange, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.9 | 19.8 | +14.1 | 54 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.1 | 23.4 | +13.7 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 68.4 | 61.2 | +7.2 | 54 |
| Access Clarity | 33.4 | 26.5 | +6.9 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.7 | 13.9 | +5.8 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 11.4 | 6.4 | +5 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 14% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Airwallex 91.4
- 2 Lightspark 70.3
- 3 Citi 62.2
- 4 Currencycloud 58.8
- 5 iBanFirst 58.8
- 6 Currencylayer 57.6
- 7 ExchangeRate-API 55.6
- 8 Fixer 54.8
- 9 Klasha 54.8
- 10 Duplo 53.4
- 1 iBanFirst 55.1
- 2 Citi 49.8
- 3 Airwallex 49
- 4 LianLian Global 46.7
- 5 Afriex 46.6
- 6 Visa 46.4
- 7 Lightspark 46.2
- 8 Worldpay 44.8
- 9 Lorum 44.8
- 10 Currencycloud 38.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.