Exchange Rates
Providers using this tag (33)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (35)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (27)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Exchange Rates” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Exchange Rates, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 28.5 | 18.6 | +9.9 | 31 |
| Contract Governance | 10.9 | 9.7 | +1.2 | 31 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.3 | 13.2 | +1.1 | 31 |
| Discoverability | 59.9 | 59.1 | +0.8 | 31 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.3 | 24.5 | +0.8 | 31 |
| Access Clarity | 22.4 | 30 | -7.6 | 31 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 18% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 1% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 61% | 36% | +25 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 APIVerve 73.9
- 2 exchangerate-dev 63.7
- 3 Abstract API 61.4
- 4 allratestoday-com 58
- 5 UniRate API 51.1
- 6 Open Exchange Rates 46.4
- 7 AGENTUM 44.9
- 8 Cambio Uruguay 39.6
- 9 Frankfurter 32.5
- 10 Cryptomus 32.2
- 1 allratestoday-com 51.2
- 2 APIVerve 51
- 3 Frankfurter 41.4
- 4 FastForex 40.5
- 5 AGENTUM 37
- 6 exchangerate-dev 35.7
- 7 UniRate API 34.2
- 8 Cryptomus 33.8
- 9 Free Currency API 33.3
- 10 Abstract API 32.3
Coverage caveat. 23 of 31 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.