Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Crypto and Digital-Asset Exchanges

Coverage market plus regulator register. The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

25providers measured

6 (24.0%)declare their own

17 (68.0%)covered by others only

1 (4.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)

1 (4.0%)undeclared

12declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)

0in-market workflows shown

Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

CoinGecko exchange coverage machine-readable
CCXT supported exchanges machine-readable
ESMA MiCA register machine-readable
NYDFS BitLicense list not machine-readable: names only
Fireblocks Network not machine-readable: console only

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 25 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

Tags	Cryptocurrency 84%, Blockchain 64%, Trading 44%, Real-Time 36%, Market Data 36%, Digital Assets 36%, Web3 32%, Exchange 32%, Custody 32%, Payments 28%, Wallets 24%, Staking 24%
Tag groups	Blockchain 100%, Real-Time 64%, Digital Assets 52%, Fintech 40%, Staking 24%, Security 20%, On-Ramp 20%
Industries	Blockchain, Crypto & Web3 100%, Investing & Venture Capital 44%, Payments & Money Movement 32%, Cybersecurity & Identity 20%
Capabilities	Developer Platform & API Ecosystem Management 20%

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Coinbase	56.3	1840	1824 / 16	0	3	2	partner-built 99%

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Ledger	44.1	3	0 / 3	0	1	0	builds-on-platform 67%, distribution 33%

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
CoinGecko	54.4	88	0 / 88	0	0	5	ipaas-bridge 6%, standard 1%, coverage 90%, covered 1%, builds-on-platform 2%

covered 5 · reached mainly through aggregators

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Mix
Gemini Trust Company	54.8	6	0 / 6	contract 50%, covered 50%
Bybit	53.3	3	0 / 3	contract 33%, covered 67%
Binance	44.9	5	0 / 5	standard 40%, covered 60%
Paxos	36.4 thin	2	0 / 2	contract 50%, covered 50%
Ripio	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	standard 50%, covered 50%

regulated 7 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	Mix
Circle	56.0	5	0 / 5	0	contract 60%, standard 20%, covered 20%
Bitstamp	54.8	6	0 / 6	0	contract 50%, standard 17%, covered 33%
Bullish	54.1	6	0 / 6	0	contract 57%, standard 14%, covered 29%
MoonPay	50.5	4	0 / 4	2	contract 50%, standard 17%, distribution 33%
BitGo	42.6 thin	2	0 / 2	0	contract 100%
Anchorage Digital	36.4 thin	2	0 / 2	0	contract 50%, standard 50%
Ramp Network	29.5 thin	2	0 / 2	1	contract 50%, distribution 50%

standard 4 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Fireblocks	50.3	8	0 / 8	1	0	contract 25%, standard 62%, distribution 12%
Alchemy	40.2	8	0 / 8	1	2	ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 50%, builds-on-platform 12%, distribution 12%
Infura	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	0	0	standard 100%
Chainalysis	26.8 thin	2	0 / 2	1	0	standard 50%, distribution 50%

mixed 4 · no single mode dominates

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	Mix
OKX	56.0	5	0 / 5	0	contract 33%, standard 33%, covered 33%
Kraken	51.8	5	0 / 5	0	contract 40%, standard 20%, covered 40%
Crypto.com	48.3	8	0 / 8	3	contract 33%, covered 22%, builds-on-platform 11%, distribution 33%
Zerion	46.4	5	0 / 5	2	standard 17%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 33%

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Kaiko	19.2 thin	2	0 / 2	0	2	0	distribution 100%

undeclared 1 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Solidus Labs	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-

Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.