Wallets
WalletWallets
Providers using this tag (133)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 39 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 22 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (197)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 30 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 69 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 67 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (117)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Wallets” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 117 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
133 providers carry this tag directly, and 134 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 129 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Wallets, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.5 | 23.4 | +21.1 | 129 |
| Contract Quality | 32.9 | 20.1 | +12.8 | 129 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.4 | 14 | +10.4 | 129 |
| Discoverability | 68.5 | 61 | +7.5 | 129 |
| Access Clarity | 28.9 | 26.5 | +2.4 | 129 |
| Contract Governance | 7.1 | 6.5 | +0.6 | 129 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 13% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 13% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 iOS 73.1
- 2 Blnk Finance 71.8
- 3 Immutable 68.4
- 4 Ziina 65.9
- 5 Natural AI 63.6
- 6 Zerion 62.9
- 7 Biconomy 58.2
- 8 BVNK 58.1
- 9 Ripple Labs 57.7
- 10 Accrue Savings 56.3
- 1 Natural AI 71.2
- 2 Agentcard 68.3
- 3 Immutable 58.9
- 4 Blnk Finance 52.2
- 5 Ripple Labs 51.8
- 6 Sponge 51.1
- 7 BVNK 50
- 8 Ziina 43.6
- 9 Rain 39.4
- 10 Accrue Savings 39.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.