Ethereum
Providers using this tag (189)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 58 Limited public surface area
Emerging 61 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 7 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (54)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (16)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Ethereum” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 181 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Ethereum, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.5 | 23.4 | +11.1 | 181 |
| Contract Quality | 26.7 | 19.8 | +6.9 | 181 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.8 | 14 | +5.8 | 181 |
| Discoverability | 66.8 | 61.2 | +5.6 | 181 |
| Contract Governance | 5.5 | 6.4 | -0.9 | 181 |
| Access Clarity | 20.7 | 26.5 | -5.8 | 181 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 96% | 97% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 14% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Zerion 62.9
- 2 OpenZeppelin 61.6
- 3 Chainstack 59.5
- 4 Biconomy 58.3
- 5 Amazon Managed Blockchain 54.2
- 6 Luno 52.5
- 7 Conduit 51.3
- 8 Optimism Etherscan 50.4
- 9 Kyber Network 50.1
- 10 Linea 48.9
- 1 WealthVille — DeFi Liquidity Pool Scores API (Solana & EVM) 44.2
- 2 Figment 41.8
- 3 Art Blocks 41.3
- 4 Deribit 40.4
- 5 Kyber Network 40.1
- 6 WAODAO 39.8
- 7 Unstoppable Domains 36.7
- 8 Biconomy 36.3
- 9 Zerion 35.1
- 10 Syndicate 34.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.