Ethereum
Providers using this tag (205)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 66 Limited public surface area
Emerging 58 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (53)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (16)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Ethereum” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
205 providers carry this tag directly, and 208 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 3 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 198 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Ethereum, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.9 | 23.2 | +10.7 | 198 |
| Contract Quality | 26.8 | 17.6 | +9.2 | 198 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.5 | 13.7 | +5.8 | 198 |
| Discoverability | 63.2 | 58.1 | +5.1 | 198 |
| Contract Governance | 6.2 | 6.3 | -0.1 | 198 |
| Access Clarity | 21.7 | 26.5 | -4.8 | 198 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 14% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 14% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Ankr 62.3
- 2 Covalent 60.9
- 3 Zerion 60.8
- 4 OpenZeppelin 60.2
- 5 Chainstack 59.6
- 6 Biconomy 56.5
- 7 Amazon Managed Blockchain 55.2
- 8 Conduit 53.2
- 9 Luno 49.9
- 10 Moirai Labs 49.5
- 1 Art Blocks 60
- 2 Moirai Labs 51.4
- 3 Flashbots 49.6
- 4 Ankr 46.9
- 5 Bitquery 43.9
- 6 Figment 41.8
- 7 WealthVille — DeFi Liquidity Pool Scores API (Solana & EVM) 41.7
- 8 NameWhisper 41.6
- 9 Kyber Network 40.1
- 10 Deribit 39.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.