JSON-RPC
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (147)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 101 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (53)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “JSON-RPC” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged JSON-RPC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.9 | 23.4 | +24.5 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 73.7 | 61.2 | +12.5 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.4 | 13.9 | +10.5 | 54 |
| Contract Quality | 23.8 | 19.8 | +4 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.4 | +2.3 | 54 |
| Access Clarity | 20.9 | 26.5 | -5.6 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Linea 48.9
- 2 Kusama 47.5
- 3 Optimism 45.6
- 4 Zircuit 43.5
- 5 Moz 43.4
- 6 Gunzilla Games 43.2
- 7 Mysten Labs 42.7
- 8 Consensys 42.6
- 9 ThunderCore 40.9
- 10 Betfair 40.5
- 1 Nervos 34.9
- 2 Mysten Labs 34.5
- 3 Flashbots 33.5
- 4 Tendermint 29.8
- 5 Gunzilla Games 29.3
- 6 Kusama 29
- 7 InfStones 24.3
- 8 Starkware 23.8
- 9 Optimism 23.4
- 10 Arbitrum 23.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.