JSON-RPC
JSON-RPCJSONRPCjson-rpc
Providers using this tag (107)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 58 Limited public surface area
Emerging 28 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (149)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 98 Limited public surface area
Emerging 30 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 107 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged JSON-RPC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.2 | 17.9 | +21.3 | 107 |
| Discoverability | 73.9 | 60.4 | +13.5 | 107 |
| Contract Quality | 31 | 17.5 | +13.5 | 107 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.5 | 11.3 | +10.2 | 107 |
| Access Clarity | 25.1 | 22.3 | +2.8 | 107 |
| Contract Governance | 8.5 | 6.4 | +2.1 | 107 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 16% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 9% | -6 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 13% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Nutshell 60.8
- 2 Coda Payments 57.1
- 3 Ava Labs 54.2
- 4 0G Labs 51.2
- 5 Kusama 48.9
- 6 SharpSpring 48.4
- 7 Blockdaemon 47
- 8 Linea 47
- 9 Zircuit 45.1
- 10 Deribit 44.6
- 1 Deribit 40.4
- 2 Nervos 34.9
- 3 Mysten Labs 34.5
- 4 Nutshell 33.8
- 5 Ava Labs 33.3
- 6 Helius 32.6
- 7 Alchemy 31.7
- 8 Gunzilla Games 31.5
- 9 0G Labs 30.6
- 10 Tendermint 29.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/json-rpc"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/json-rpc"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/json-rpc/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.